2022
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of a population pharmacokinetic model to inform tacrolimus therapy in heart transplant recipients

Abstract: Existing tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic models are unsuitable for guiding tacrolimus dosing in heart transplant recipients. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a population pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients that considers the tacrolimus-azole antifungal interaction.Methods: Data from heart transplant recipients (n = 87) administered the oral immediate-release formulation of tacrolimus (Prograf ® ) were collected. Routine drug monitoring data, principally trough con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
8
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(191 reference statements)
5
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison to the PK parameters of Woillard et al in renal transplant patients showed that in heart transplant patients the apparent clearance was slightly decreased (from 0.37 to 0.20 L·h −1 ·kg −1 ) and the central compartment volume was strongly decreased (from 3.66 to 0.22 L kg −1 ) 22 . Similarly, our apparent clearance is in line with the apparent clearance of other heart transplant patient models (0.27 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Kirubakaran et al, 1 0.22 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Gong et al 2 and 0.21 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Han et al 3 ). The same was observed for our apparent central volume of distribution, which was also strongly decreased compared to the heart transplant model (2.55 L kg −1 for Kirubakaran et al, 1 11.52 L kg −1 for Gong et al 2 and 12.17 L kg −1 for Han et al 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison to the PK parameters of Woillard et al in renal transplant patients showed that in heart transplant patients the apparent clearance was slightly decreased (from 0.37 to 0.20 L·h −1 ·kg −1 ) and the central compartment volume was strongly decreased (from 3.66 to 0.22 L kg −1 ) 22 . Similarly, our apparent clearance is in line with the apparent clearance of other heart transplant patient models (0.27 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Kirubakaran et al, 1 0.22 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Gong et al 2 and 0.21 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Han et al 3 ). The same was observed for our apparent central volume of distribution, which was also strongly decreased compared to the heart transplant model (2.55 L kg −1 for Kirubakaran et al, 1 11.52 L kg −1 for Gong et al 2 and 12.17 L kg −1 for Han et al 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, our apparent clearance is in line with the apparent clearance of other heart transplant patient models (0.27 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Kirubakaran et al, 1 0.22 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Gong et al 2 and 0.21 L·h −1 ·kg −1 for Han et al 3 ). The same was observed for our apparent central volume of distribution, which was also strongly decreased compared to the heart transplant model (2.55 L kg −1 for Kirubakaran et al, 1 11.52 L kg −1 for Gong et al 2 and 12.17 L kg −1 for Han et al 3 ). In lung and heart transplant patients, Sikma et al 11 observed an apparent central volume of distribution around 2.99 L kg −1 , which is also far from our value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations