2019
DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of a Proactive Smoking Cessation Intervention to Increase Tobacco Quitline Use by LGBT Smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interviews will be analyzed according to the methods of framework analysis ( 39 ). We expect to reach saturation with the proposed sample sizes based on our prior experience ( 40 – 43 ). NVivo will be used for qualitative data management and analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interviews will be analyzed according to the methods of framework analysis ( 39 ). We expect to reach saturation with the proposed sample sizes based on our prior experience ( 40 – 43 ). NVivo will be used for qualitative data management and analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“… 63 Acceptance and commitment therapy focuses on building psychological flexibility—defined as a willingness to experience uncomfortable thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations without attempting to change them—and having clarity of one’s values to act in a way that is in service of those values. 63 , 64 Self-determination Theory, 65 cited as informing one intervention, 66 emphasizes the importance of competence, relatedness, and autonomy in the successful achievement of goal-directed behavior, like smoking cessation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention delivery approaches have been heterogeneous, including in-person group sessions, 54 , 59 online interventions, 56 , 63 video ad campaigns, outreach letters, 66 and hybrid digital, venue, and event-based social marketing campaigns. 77 , 78 Publications reported a broad range of evaluation designs from cross-sectional pre- and post-intervention surveys within selected geographical areas 67 , 68 , 77 , 78 to assessment of within-subject outcomes post-intervention, 49–51 , 54–56 , 58 , 59 qualitative assessment of intervention acceptability, 66 , 70 and use of single arm trials 49 , 50 , 53 , 59 , 63 versus those with comparison and/or control groups. 53 , 56 , 58 , 67 , 68 , 82 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%