2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of a triaxial cell for ultrasonic P-wave attenuation, velocity and acoustic emission measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies can increase basic understanding and help to discriminate between cases where the two methods are either redundant or truly complement each other. Adaptations of existing triaxial cells for ultrasonic P‐and S‐wave measurements are well documented (Birch 1960, 1961; Winkler and Plona 1982; Prasad and Manghnani 1997; Donald, Butt and Iakovler 2004). This paper proposes further modification of such a cell so that also axial resistivity measurements can be carried out simultaneously at reservoir conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies can increase basic understanding and help to discriminate between cases where the two methods are either redundant or truly complement each other. Adaptations of existing triaxial cells for ultrasonic P‐and S‐wave measurements are well documented (Birch 1960, 1961; Winkler and Plona 1982; Prasad and Manghnani 1997; Donald, Butt and Iakovler 2004). This paper proposes further modification of such a cell so that also axial resistivity measurements can be carried out simultaneously at reservoir conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and validation of this loading and ultrasonic transmission system is described in detail in a related publication (23) . The design and validation of this loading and ultrasonic transmission system is described in detail in a related publication (23) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of scatter in the Q p values is the result of the digital sampling rate and the number of Pwave samples available after windowing, which averaged approximately 20 samples but was lower for sample PH472-N that showed the most scatter. This problem has been addressed in later research by increasing the digital sampling rate 10-fold, correspondingly increasing the number of P-wave samples and significantly reducing the scatter (Donald et al, 2004). As with the velocity data, samples tested at higher confining pressure have initially higher Q p values.…”
Section: Velocity and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%