Similar Languages, Varieties, and Dialects 2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108565080.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of Morphosyntactic Taggers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible pick that satisfies all the requirements is the Stanza tagger, developed at Stanford for Universal Dependencies tagging (Qi et al, 2018) . It was recently modified to use bidirectional character-level LSTM by default, and specifically adjusted to the aims of part-of-speech tagging, the starting point for lowresource NLP (Scherrer, 2021). This fork is used in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible pick that satisfies all the requirements is the Stanza tagger, developed at Stanford for Universal Dependencies tagging (Qi et al, 2018) . It was recently modified to use bidirectional character-level LSTM by default, and specifically adjusted to the aims of part-of-speech tagging, the starting point for lowresource NLP (Scherrer, 2021). This fork is used in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now a lot of attention is paid to the selection of data to train, evaluate, and test a tagger on (Muradoglu and Hulden, 2022). The old models (Qi et al, 2018) are adjusted (Scherrer, 2021) to meet the new requirements of efficient training on low-resourced closely-related lects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part-ofspeech tagging is mostly dominated by universal methods, based on recurrent neural networks (Qi et al, 2018) (Qi et al, 2020). Yet the tasks conducted on different language varieties demand agile models that can both be tuned for the needs of a specific tagset and work in the context of lowresourced and sparse data (Scherrer, 2021). Hidden Markov Model (HMM)-based taggers present this opportunity (Schmid, 1994(Schmid, , 1995Özçelik et al, 2019;Lyashevskaya and Afanasev, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part-ofspeech tagging is mostly dominated by universal methods, based on recurrent neural networks (Qi et al, 2018) ). Yet the tasks conducted on different language varieties demand agile models that can both be tuned for the needs of a specific tagset and work in the context of lowresourced and sparse data (Scherrer, 2021). Hidden Markov Model (HMM)-based taggers present this opportunity (Schmid, 1994(Schmid, , 1995Özçelik et al, 2019;Lyashevskaya and Afanasev, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires using special metrics for imbalanced data (Dudy and Bedrick, 2020). The harmonic F1 score, traditionally used for such cases (Chinchor, 1992), still finds its application in the analysis of NLP tasks (Scherrer, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%