The purpose of the present experiment was to investigate the extent to which subjects can perceive, at very slow velocities, an angular rotation of the support surface about the medic-lateral axis of the ankle, knee, hip, or neck joint when visual cues are not available. Subjects were passively displaced on a slowly rotating platform at .01, .03, and .05 deglsec. The subjects' task was to detect movements of the platform in four different postural conditions allowing body oscillations about the ankle, knee, hip, or neck joint. In Experiment 1,subjects had to detect backward and forward rotation (pitching). In Experiment 2, they had to detect left and right rotations of the platform (rolling). In Experiment 3, subjects had to detect both backward/forward and left/right rotations of the platform, with the body fixed and the head either fixed or free to move. Overall, when the body was free to oscillate about the ankle, knee, or hip joints, a similar threshold for movement perception was observed. This threshold was lower for rolling than for pitching. Interestingly, in these postural conditions, an unconscious compensation in the direction opposite to the platform rotation was observed on most trials. The threshold for movement perception was much higher when the head was the only segment free to oscillate about the neck joint. These results suggest that, in static conditions, the otoliths are poor detectors of the direction of gravity forces. They also suggest that accurate perception of body orientation is improved when proprioceptive information can be dynamically integrated.How we orient ourselves in space is a fundamental problem for the understanding ofupright stance regulation. Under normal circumstances, the perceived orientation of the body with respect to gravity is based on the integration of sensory information from the visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular systems. A common assumption is that the center of gravity projection onto the ground is one of the external regulated values available to determine postural stability (see Massion, 1992, for a review). The question ofhow this regulated value is computed, however, remains a matter of debate. One hypothesis is that otolith organs are graviceptors (Young, 1984) or graviceptive organs (Platt, 1984) that provide information about the direction of gravity forces and the orientation of the body with respect to them. This argument is based on the premise that Correspondence should be addressed to V. Nougier, Universite Joseph Fourier, UFRAPS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble cedex 9, France (e-mail: vincent.nougier@ujf-grenoble.fr).-Accepted by previous editor. Myron L. Braunstein the otoliths can directly compute the projection ofthe center ofgravity onto the base ofsupport. Stoffregen and his co-workers (Riccio, Martin, & Stoffregen, 1992;Stoffregen & Riccio, 1988) have argued that this cannot be the case because gravitational stimulation ofthe otolith organs gives rise only to a poor perception ofthe direction ofgravity. For example, when immersed in the water-th...