Adaptation of powered wheelchairs for quadriplegic patients with reduced strength

Urbano, Margarida; Fonseca, J.; Nunes, Urbano; Figueiredo, Luís; Lopes, A.

doi:10.1109/etfa.2008.4638535

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This was accounted for by the higher level of impairment of tetraplegic users and/or insufficient upper limb strength and function. Inability of EPIOC users with SCI to use a standard joystick control may be due to insufficient strength in the hands, lack of flexion and extension in wrists and fingers, or severe fatigue (Urbano, Fonseca, Numes, & Figueiredo, 2008). In addition, the need to adapt the control system to interface with other assistive technology (e.g.…”

Section: Wheelchair Features and Seatingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical features of electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: A cross-sectional study

Souza

Frank

2018

Assistive Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to describe the characteristics of those with a primary diagnosis of spinal cord injury (SCI) attending a specialist wheelchair service providing electric powered indoor/outdoor chairs (EPIOCs). This cross-sectional study, with retrospective review of electronic and case note records, explores the complexities of additional clinical features associated with SCI and disability influencing prescription. Data were extracted under three themes; demographics, diagnostic/clinical information and wheelchair factors. There were 57 participants (35 men, 22 women) (mean age 53.51 ± 11.93, range 29-79 years) comprising 20 with paraplegia, 34 with tetraplegia and 3 with undocumented level. Paraplegics were significantly older than tetraplegics (p < 0.05). Thirty users had a complete SCI (mean age 49.87 ± 12.27 years) and 27 had another SCI lesion (mean age 57.56 ± 10.32 years). Those with a complete SCI were significantly younger than the rest (p < 0.02). Only 10 (9 tetraplegic) had SCI as the sole diagnosis. Twenty (15 tetraplegic) had one additional clinical feature, 14 had 2-3 (6 tetraplegic) and 13 (4 tetraplegic) had 4 or more. Ten users required specialised seating, 22 needed tilt-in-space EPIOCs while six required complex controls. The range and complexity of wheelchair and seating needs benefitted from a holistic assessment and prescription by a specialist multidisciplinary team.

show abstract

Section: Wheelchair Features and Seatingmentioning

confidence: 99%