1983
DOI: 10.1071/pp9830119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of Species of Centrosema to Water Stress

Abstract: The responses to water stress of five accessions representing four species of the legume Centrosema from contrasting moisture environments were compared under controlled conditions with those of Macroptilium atropurpureum cv. Siratro, a species which avoids dehydration. Species of Centrosema were able to tolerate leaf water potentials as low as -8 to -12 MPa, and all showed osmotic and stomatal adjustment. However, they differed in the tolerance of their leaves to water stress and in the leaf water potential a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, leaf water potential would fall more rapidly as a result of OA (Morgan 1984) and cause leaf and plant death when the threshold of lethal relative water content is reached, or if the soil water is exhausted (Ludlow & Muchow 1990). Ludlow & Muchow (1990) further illustrated this case by pointing out that some high OA legume species die before other species that have low OA (Ludlow et al . 1983;Sinclair & Ludlow 1986).…”
Section: Turgor Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, leaf water potential would fall more rapidly as a result of OA (Morgan 1984) and cause leaf and plant death when the threshold of lethal relative water content is reached, or if the soil water is exhausted (Ludlow & Muchow 1990). Ludlow & Muchow (1990) further illustrated this case by pointing out that some high OA legume species die before other species that have low OA (Ludlow et al . 1983;Sinclair & Ludlow 1986).…”
Section: Turgor Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach outlined above is the most appropiate to test the adaptive value of a particular mechanism, although it would require substantial time and effort. Meanwhile, species comparisons in agronomie performance under drought (e.g., Lawn, 1982 b) and in water stress tolerance and survival (e.g., Ludlow et al, 1983) provide clear evidence of the large number of adaptive mechanisms to water deficits and the wide range in the degree of their expression. lt is this variability which offers the greatest hope for overcoming the numerous difficulties encountered in breeding crop plants for drought resistance.…”
Section: ~~-----------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, the photosynthetic apparatus also adjusts to water stress, maintaining reasonable rates of carbon dioxide assimilation which in turn require a certain degree of stomatal opening. The recent work of Ludlow et al (1983) demonstrating good correlation between stomatal adjustment and the water stress tolerance of severa! legumes, confirms the important role that stomatal response to water stress plays in plant adaptation to water deficits.…”
Section: ~~-----------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of molecular markers (DNA markers) provides a more effective selection technique for crop improvement and has an advantage over selection based on phenotype [5,10]. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) are PCR-based markers and proved to be very powerful tools for investigating genetic relationships between plant species and genetic mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought resistance is a complex trait influenced by four general physiological mechanisms: Escape, avoidance, tolerance, and recovery [4,5,8,13]. In upland rice root thickness, deep rooting, and root/shoot ratio are considered as the most important root traits for drought resistance [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%