Adaptation of Technologies Making Clean out Operations Environment Friendly and Cost Effective - Converting Failure into Success Using New Type of Fluidic Oscillator

Abstract

A case study is presented detailing the methodology used to perform the clean-out operation in a water disposal well of Khurmala Field, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Untreated disposed water caused scaling and plugging in perforated liner and in the open hole that eventually ceased injection. Multiple attempts and investments were made in recent years to resume access to the injection zone using high-pressure hydro-jetting tools coupled with acid treatments. However, these attempts yielded futile efforts. Before proceeding with the decision of workover, it was decided to go for one final attempt to regain wellbore access using Fluidic Oscillator (SFO). Fluidic Oscillator (SFO) having pulsing, cavitation and helix jetting action was used in combination with a train of fluids consisting of diesel, 28% HCl and gel. The clean out was performed in stages of 10m, to clean the fill from 1091m to 1170m. Since the well bore was initially isolated from the injection zone, the cleanout was conducted with non-nitrified fluids. As the cleanout progressed and access to the liner and open hole was regained, the circulation of insoluble fill to surface required a lighter carrying fluid. Nitrification, volume of the fluids, batch cycling, and ROP were designed considering the downhole dynamic changes expected during each stage of the operation. The combination of SFO, the thorough selection of treatment fluids and the accurate downhole hydraulics simulations pertaining to different stages of the operation offered an effective solution and regained the connectivity between the wellbore and the injection zone. The injection rate of water increased from 0 bpm at 700 psi to 15 bpm at 200 psi. Throughout this operation, the SFO helix, cavitation, and acoustic pulse (alike) jetting proved to be more effective than other single acting rotating jetting tools. Also, Environmental impact was reduced by eliminating the need for a rig workover operation. The matching of the injection pressure when the well was first completed and the post job value indicated that the complete zone was exposed and scale deposits were removed from the critical matrix or bypassed. SFO has an effective jetting near wellbore region, while the kinetic energy transferred via fluid makes the impact stronger in the deeper region. Internal mechanism of the tool allows it to handle high pumping rate and pressures, external finishing offer multi-port orientation of outflow that allows targeting the fill in desired directions. Presently the SFO used in the case study is the only technology that has pulse, cavitation, and helix jetting structure. Also, since the tool does not require redressing, it proves to be an efficient, safe and cost effective alternative

Renovation method of restoring well productivity using wavefields

“…Заключение. В результате проведенного исследования получены результаты: выведены формулы ( 15), ( 17) и построены графики распространения волн давления и скорости жидкости на исследуемом участке (рис.4); определено соответствие размеров вовлеченных в волновое движение частиц с размерами поровых каналов для исходных условий (табл.3, формула (19); сделаны теоретические выводы о размерах твердых частиц кольматантов, эффективно вовлекаемых в волновое движение (формула (9) и рис.5); выведена зависимость (18) координаты частицы кольматантов, испытывающих виброимпульсное воздействие, от времени; оценена степень влияния волнового воздействия на частицы разных размеров в пределах исследуемой зоны пористой структуры (рис.6); обоснована практическая реализация способа виброволновой обработки в виде последовательности технологических операций.…”

“…Внедрение способа может являться одним из вариантов импортозамещения установок струйного и пульсирующего воздействия [18][19][20], электрогидравлических приборов [21-23], актуального в современных условиях развития отрасли.…”

“…Технологическое применение стационарной репрессии на пласт рассмотрено в работе [12], переменного градиента давления -за рубежом [13, 14] и в России [15][16][17]. Разработаны гидравлические инструменты струйного и пульсирующего воздействия [18][19][20], электрогидравлические приборы [21-23], гидродинамические генераторы ГД2В, сейсмические гидросистемы СВС-24/РС27, СВ-27/150Б «Русич», другие приборы [24,25]. Эффективность применения волновых и вибрационных методов обоснована и доказана в работах [26][27][28].…”