2007
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2007)100[562:atasro]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation to and Small-Scale Rearing of Invasive Fruit Fly <I>Bactrocera invadens</I> (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Artificial Diet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
66
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
66
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the survival curves of the different populations reared on artificial diet showed that the maximum longevity of both females and males was greater for Lab-Pop than for Hybrid-Pop. These results are in agreement with other studies involving species in which a reduced survival in wild populations reared on an artificial diet has been found (Leppla 1983, Economopoulos 1992, Ekesi et al 2007.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Comparisons of the survival curves of the different populations reared on artificial diet showed that the maximum longevity of both females and males was greater for Lab-Pop than for Hybrid-Pop. These results are in agreement with other studies involving species in which a reduced survival in wild populations reared on an artificial diet has been found (Leppla 1983, Economopoulos 1992, Ekesi et al 2007.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), Leppla et al (1983) explained the precipitous decline in yield during the Þrst generation as following a change from natural host to artiÞcial mass-rearing methods, indicating that this method is inadequate. Ekesi et al (2007) observed that pupal recovery increased throughout the generations during the colonization of Bactrocera invadens Drew, Tsuruta & White. This trend could be explained by the fact that colony founders are forced though genetic bottlenecks to eliminate variability as well as phenotypes that prevent adaptation to the larval diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even after nine generations, the fecundity of wild C. capitata did not match the levels of laboratory-adapted flies (Economopoulos, 1992;De Souza et al, 1988) and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coqillett) required 14 generations to reach a stable oviposition plateau (Kamikado et al, 1987). In the olive fruit fly, approximately three to four generations were required to adapt (Tsitsipis, 1983) and Bactrocera invadens adapted to an artificial diet in three to five generations (Ekesi et al, 2007). In some cases, attempts to colonize a wild population on artificial diets have failed (Rössler, 1975).…”
Section: Protocol For Culturing the Flies From F1 To F5 Generationsmentioning
confidence: 99%