Adaptation to transboundary climate risks in trade: Investigating actors and strategies for an emerging challenge

Abstract

There is growing recognition that international trade can transmit climate risks across borders, requiring new forms of and approaches to adaptation. This advanced review synthesizes knowledge on how, by whom and where adaptation actions can be taken in the agriculture and industrial sectors to reduce these transboundary climate risks (TCRs). We find a material difference in the literature on TCRs in agriculture as compared with industrial sectors. Operational and market risks, in particular reductions in food availability, dominate in agriculture, while supply chain and trade‐related risks are highlighted for industry. While the origin of the risk (source) is the primary target of adaptation to agricultural TCRs, the general governance structure, such as UNFCCC and WTO deliberations, are important targets in both sectors. Adaptation at the country of destination and along the trade network is of minor importance in both sectors. Regarding the type of adaptation option, agriculture heavily relies on trade policy, agricultural adaptation, and adaptation planning and coordination, while in industry knowledge creation, research and development, and risk management are seen as essential. Governments and the international community are identified as key actors, complemented by businesses and research as critical players in industry. Some measures, such as protectionist trade policies and irrigation, are controversial as they shift risks across countries and sectors, rather than reduce them. While more research is needed, this review shows that a critical mass of evidence on adaptation to TCRs is beginning to emerge, particularly underscoring the importance of international coordination mechanisms. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance

The role of Europe in building system-wide resilience to cross-border climate impacts

“…This approach will require adaptation-related investments in the entire food system, from farming to processing to marketing domestic produce (Dekeyser et al 2020;Benzie and John 2015). Other adaptation solutions in agri-food systems might also include setting up strategic crop reserves, contingency planning, genetic diversification or diet change diversification (Bednar-Friedl et al 2022).…”

New risk horizons: Sweden’s exposure to climate risk via international trade

“…Very little analytical work has been undertaken to identify adaptation options for transboundary climate risk via trade (Bednar-Friedl et al, 2022). Conceptually, Sweden might consider a range of responses, such as those summarized in Table 4.…”

Revealing indirect risks in complex socioeconomic systems: A highly detailed multi‐model analysis of flood events in Austria

“…This is particularly the case for industrialized countries, as they are characterized by a high degree of specialization and strong inter-sectoral dependencies and feedbacks. Moreover, risk is also propagating via trade across country borders (Bednar-Friedl et al, 2022;Carter et al, 2021), adding to the complexity (Centeno et al, 2015).…”