2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptational characteristics of autochthonous populations—consequences for provenance delineation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…genealogical continuity) of woody plants at a specific site since the arrival of the species after post-glacial remigration. (KLEINSCHMIT et al, 2004). In comparison, the term native denotes that the growing site is a part of the natural geographic range of the species, and does not automatically imply local adaptation.…”
Section: Autochthonous Trees and Shrubsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…genealogical continuity) of woody plants at a specific site since the arrival of the species after post-glacial remigration. (KLEINSCHMIT et al, 2004). In comparison, the term native denotes that the growing site is a part of the natural geographic range of the species, and does not automatically imply local adaptation.…”
Section: Autochthonous Trees and Shrubsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower in the taxonomic hierarchy, genetic diversity is a necessary means of survival in dynamic ecological equilibria. Long-lived tree and shrub species need to maintain their genetic diversity in order to ensure that their progeny can remain well adapted to complex heterogeneous environments (BEHM et al, 1997, KLEINSCHMIT et al, 2004.…”
Section: Reasons For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is a significant mass of literature about the most commonly applied methods for delimiting Regions of Provenance according to the factors mentioned above (e.g. Geburek & Konrad, 2008;Kleinschmit et al, 2004;Lindgren & Ying, 2000;Krusche & Geburek, 1991;Raymond & Lindgren, 1990). They usually refer to the division of the territory (divisive method), if ecological parameters are considered, instead of joining of similar populations (agglomerative method) according to common biological features.…”
Section: Common Criteria For the Definition Of The Regions Of Provenancementioning
confidence: 99%