Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About Evolutionary Causes

Abstract

This article discusses various dangers that accompany the supposedly benign methods in behavioral evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology that fall under the framework of ''methodological adaptationism.'' A ''Logic of Research Questions'' is proposed that aids in clarifying the reasoning problems that arise due to the framework under critique. The live, and widely practiced, ''evolutionary factors'' framework is offered as the key comparison and alternative. The article goes beyond the traditional critique of Stephen Jay Gould and Richard C. Lewontin, to present problems such as the disappearance of evidence, the mishandling of the null hypothesis, and failures in scientific reasoning, exemplified by a case from human behavioral ecology. In conclusion the paper shows that ''methodological adaptationism'' does not deserve its benign reputation.

Stranger in a strange land: an optimal-environments account of evolutionary mismatch

“…Thus, the view advanced by Lloyd et al seems (at least as they use it in the RubisCO case) to suggest that traits can involve mismatches even when they are part of fitness-enhancing wholes. (Similar to the worry about excessive atomization in Lloyd (2015), it is also unclear to me that RubisCO can be treated as biologically distinct from other cellular mechanisms in the way Lloyd et al describe. ) Now, Lloyd et al acknowledge the challenges inherent to individuating traits, and they might point to a number of ways to identify RubisCO as a distinct trait: its function, the specific genes which code for it, and so forth.…”

Astrobiology as Hybrid Science: Introduction to the Thematic Issue

“…A hybrid science is thus problemcentered (as opposed to disciplinary-centered), reflexive, aware of the limitations of time and place, and alert to possible confounding assumptions and bias. A logic of research questions, and the research to which questions are connected, are still crucial (Lloyd 2015). (See Griesemer (2013) for a more general approach to hybridity that could be used to understand the evolution and development of science.…”

Female orgasm and the emergence of prosocial empathy: An evo‐devo perspective

“…Some such vestiges disappear, but others may be so tightly integrated in the organism's development that they (secondarily to the original function) play a structural role and persist across generations. For these reasons, it is important to ask whether a trait is adaptive in the first place, rather than assuming that this is the case (Lloyd, ); and to confirm adaptation, it is not sufficient to show that a trait affects fitness in one species, or that it has been maintained in evolution, as the current role might not have been its original function (Wagner & Pavlicev, ). Most work on female orgasm has not focused on studying the origin, but rather on the role that the female orgasm plays in humans or in the primate lineage.…”