1992
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

23
6,230
6
24

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9,475 publications
(6,283 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
23
6,230
6
24
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected each predictor variable based on previous research or clinical experience suggesting it is an important risk factor for sepsis. We abstracted (or calculated) the following predictors from HRS survey and linked Medicare data: self reported race and ethnicity, partnership status (married or part of a couple), limitations of five activities and six instrumental activities of daily living (I/ADLs), self rating of health on a 5 point Likert scale, body mass index (BMI), wealth (sum of all assets and debts) standardized to 2013 $ using the annual gross domestic product price index,21 previous or current use of food stamps (a government assistance program for low income families and individuals), residence in a nursing home, 17 Charlson comorbidities,22 23 admissions to hospital in the previous year, and admissions for sepsis in the previous year. Limitations of activities and instrumental activities of daily living, self reported health, government assistance, and BMI were missing in 7.1%, 0.1%, 0.1%, 0.6%, and 1.3%, respectively, and these values were imputed with multiple imputation with chained equations and five imputations 24.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected each predictor variable based on previous research or clinical experience suggesting it is an important risk factor for sepsis. We abstracted (or calculated) the following predictors from HRS survey and linked Medicare data: self reported race and ethnicity, partnership status (married or part of a couple), limitations of five activities and six instrumental activities of daily living (I/ADLs), self rating of health on a 5 point Likert scale, body mass index (BMI), wealth (sum of all assets and debts) standardized to 2013 $ using the annual gross domestic product price index,21 previous or current use of food stamps (a government assistance program for low income families and individuals), residence in a nursing home, 17 Charlson comorbidities,22 23 admissions to hospital in the previous year, and admissions for sepsis in the previous year. Limitations of activities and instrumental activities of daily living, self reported health, government assistance, and BMI were missing in 7.1%, 0.1%, 0.1%, 0.6%, and 1.3%, respectively, and these values were imputed with multiple imputation with chained equations and five imputations 24.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidity and illness severity were controlled for by using the Charlson comorbidity index 7. Data were collected by the Mayo Clinic Life Science System (a data repository) and the Data Discovery and Query Builder (a query toolset; IBM) and manually reviewed by investigators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This score ranges from 0 to 33, with higher scores corresponding to a larger burden of comorbid conditions (Table S4). 9 Annual hospital volume of procedure was calculated by using unique hospital identification provided by NRD. We also evaluated LOS provided by NRD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%