2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting and piloting a vaccine hesitancy questionnaire in rural Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our wealth index was scored on a scale of 0–24, assigning up to 8 points in each of 3 demographic categories (income, assets, education). To assess vaccine hesitancy, we used the 5-question validated Guatemalan Vaccine Attitudes (GuaVA) tool ( S1 Table ), which is scored from 0 to 10; a score of 0 is considered “not hesitant”, scores of 1–3 are considered “somewhat hesitant”, and scores of 4–10 are considered “hesitant” [ 4 ]. We asked community members how strongly they trusted different leaders for advice on childhood vaccines (e.g., A lot, A little, Not Sure).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our wealth index was scored on a scale of 0–24, assigning up to 8 points in each of 3 demographic categories (income, assets, education). To assess vaccine hesitancy, we used the 5-question validated Guatemalan Vaccine Attitudes (GuaVA) tool ( S1 Table ), which is scored from 0 to 10; a score of 0 is considered “not hesitant”, scores of 1–3 are considered “somewhat hesitant”, and scores of 4–10 are considered “hesitant” [ 4 ]. We asked community members how strongly they trusted different leaders for advice on childhood vaccines (e.g., A lot, A little, Not Sure).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary outcome variables, independent variables of interest, and analytic approaches differed by study aim. For our first aim, which sought to compare religious leaders’ and community leaders’ attitudes related to childhood vaccines, our primary outcome was GuaVA score, by category noted above [ 4 ]. Independent variables included modified wealth index, age, family size, sex, and religion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation