2014
DOI: 10.1080/21577323.2014.905884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Engineering Design Tools to Include Human Factors

Abstract: The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this article could help corporate managers to realise the impact of human error on production costs as well as accidents and occupational health hazards in uncertain manufacturing environments. This paper contributes to a stream of research that emphasises integrating human aspects into operations models as called for by [29] and as exemplified by the integration of human aspects like biomechanical loading and fatigue into discrete event simulation [33,34], connecting learning and forgetting into mathematical models of Dual Resource Constrained (DRC) systems [35,36,37], modelling production costs in ways that include employee health hazards [38], and incorporating human aspects into industrial engineering design tools to support the production system design process [39]. This current study contributes to this agenda by providing further examples of novel approaches to integrating human aspects into engineering design and decision making tools that can support better design choices for both improved system safety and long term system performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented in this article could help corporate managers to realise the impact of human error on production costs as well as accidents and occupational health hazards in uncertain manufacturing environments. This paper contributes to a stream of research that emphasises integrating human aspects into operations models as called for by [29] and as exemplified by the integration of human aspects like biomechanical loading and fatigue into discrete event simulation [33,34], connecting learning and forgetting into mathematical models of Dual Resource Constrained (DRC) systems [35,36,37], modelling production costs in ways that include employee health hazards [38], and incorporating human aspects into industrial engineering design tools to support the production system design process [39]. This current study contributes to this agenda by providing further examples of novel approaches to integrating human aspects into engineering design and decision making tools that can support better design choices for both improved system safety and long term system performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, HF could be ignored not only due to a lack of connection of HF to organization goals, but also due to a lack of HF knowledge within the organization or within specific individuals. Though HF may be considered common sense (Helander, 1999), the HF information communicated to other stakeholders has shown a lack of appropriate context in reporting information and in the training content to nonspecialists (Wulff et al, 1999b;Village et al, 2013b;Hall-Andersen and Broberg, 2014;Village et al, 2014b). One method of improving the relation of HF to organizational goals is adapting existing organization tools and practices to include HF information and concepts (e.g.…”
Section: Human Factors Needs Measurement and Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Design for manufacturing and assembly guidelines (DFA or HF-DFA) to create cost-effective and operator assembly-friendly products (e.g., Boothroyd et al 2001;Village et al 2014). These methods and guidelines are used in the application developed in "UIW: the Circular Economy Design Framework" (see Bosch, Chapter "Sustainable Furniture That Grows With End-Users" this book).…”
Section: Methodologies To Support Parallel Product and Process Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Human Factor Design for Assembly (HF-DFA) tool, based on the DFA methodology described by Boothroyd et al (2001), can be used to evaluate the ease of assembly tasks from an operator perspective (Village et al 2014) and improve product design. The face validity and simple scoring of the tool facilitates integration into the design process.…”
Section: Product Development: Modular Product Architecture and Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%