2016
DOI: 10.1101/055798
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Genotyping-by-Sequencing for Rice F2 Populations

Abstract: Rapid and cost-effective genotyping of large mapping populations can be achieved by sequencing a reduced representation of the genome of every individual in a given population, and using that information to generate genetic markers. A customized genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) pipeline was developed to genotype a rice F2 population from a cross of Oryza sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare and the African wild rice species O. longistaminata. While most GBS pipelines aim to analyze mainly homozygous populations, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently with the advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, genotyping by sequencing (GBS) has emerged as a promising genomic approach for simultaneous exploration of plant genetic diversity and molecular marker discovery [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Thus, GBS has effectively been used for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) marker discovery and QTL identification of tightly linked marker-trait associations [ 27 , 28 ] and in the application of genomic selection of complex traits for crop improvement [ 29 , 30 ]. The GBS approach is therefore considered an important cost-effective tool for population genetics, QTL discovery, high-resolution mapping and for genomic selection in plant breeding programs [ 25 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently with the advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, genotyping by sequencing (GBS) has emerged as a promising genomic approach for simultaneous exploration of plant genetic diversity and molecular marker discovery [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Thus, GBS has effectively been used for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) marker discovery and QTL identification of tightly linked marker-trait associations [ 27 , 28 ] and in the application of genomic selection of complex traits for crop improvement [ 29 , 30 ]. The GBS approach is therefore considered an important cost-effective tool for population genetics, QTL discovery, high-resolution mapping and for genomic selection in plant breeding programs [ 25 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, GBS has effectively been used for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) marker discovery and QTL identification of tightly linked marker-trait associations [ 27 , 28 ] and in the application of genomic selection of complex traits for crop improvement [ 29 , 30 ]. The GBS approach is therefore considered an important cost-effective tool for population genetics, QTL discovery, high-resolution mapping and for genomic selection in plant breeding programs [ 25 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biallelic tags having either missing value with more than half of F 2 individuals or a P-value of <0.001 based on the chi-squared test were eliminated from the genotype data. Because the genotype data from the NGS approach had the drawback of a large amount of missing data 24,25 in most cases, we applied the ABHgenotypeR package of R 25 for post-data correction and imputation. The parameter of maxHapLength in ABHgenotypeR was adjusted to five.…”
Section: Genotyping and Linkage Map Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting set of 10, 323 SNPs were transformed to hapmap format, and filtered to identify segregating sites (allele frequency > 0.2 and < 0.8), thinned to minimum spacing of 1 kb, and transformed to ABH format (A: PT; B: RV) using TASSEL v5.0 (Bradbury et al 2007). The data were inspected visually using ABHgenotypeR v1.0.1 (Furuta et al 2017), and passed to the ABHgenotypeR pipeline to impute missing data, corrected for under-called heterozygous sites, and corrected for single interspersed alleles using a maximum haplotype length of 6. The proportion of missing sites dropped from 0.57 to 0.02 following imputation.…”
Section: Genotypic Analysis Of a Rv X Pt F 2 Family And Construction mentioning
confidence: 99%