Rasch Models in Health 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118574454.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures for Use in New Languages and Cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with others that have highlighted the intricacies in designing a multi-lingual, culturally competent survey that can be applied in a culturally diverse setting across different treatment contexts [16,35]. Overall, our results demonstrate that this unmet needs survey is somewhat invariant with respect to these factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are consistent with others that have highlighted the intricacies in designing a multi-lingual, culturally competent survey that can be applied in a culturally diverse setting across different treatment contexts [16,35]. Overall, our results demonstrate that this unmet needs survey is somewhat invariant with respect to these factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It may be that the Chinese-language responders actually had greater support of this kind from their communities than did the other groups. However, given this DIF was language specific, an alternative explanation is that the Chinese translation had a somewhat different interpretation to the other language versions, despite rigorous forward and backward translation, as translation issues have commonly been found to be the source of DIF in patientreported outcome assessments [35,36]. Future qualitative research should investigate source(s) of bias in these items for Chinese language responders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, verbatim comments (the exact words) from the participants can be used to explore and define new item content. [23][24][25] The interviewer should aim to get as many descriptive verbatim responses as possible in order to capture possible new meaningful item themes from the target group, which in fact is a primary objective of all interviews. 9,10, 23,24 It is also important to include a variety of target patients (eg, patients prior to operative treatment and at varying postoperative intervals, patients from varying socioeconomic communities, or patients with varying stages of disease), as a too homogenous group of patients might result in insufficient coverage.…”
Section: Step 3: Content Validationconfirming Item Relevance and Coverage In Promsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COPM encompasses the occupational performance items and help improve measurements through the recommendations of a panel of experts [27]. Thus, in the translation process into Danish, the aspect of content validity was given special attention and examined as recommended by the content validity index (CVI) and debriefing interviews [30,31]. The study revealed issues with the content validity of the COPM-DK [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%