2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting the planning and management of Norway spruce forests in mountain areas of Romania to environmental conditions including climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field observations were made through a key-area mapping method. A key area of 507.05 ha was chosen in such way as to capture the diversity of site conditions encountered in the mountain forests of mixed beech and coniferous stands in the area [22]. The working method was tested on the key area (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field observations were made through a key-area mapping method. A key area of 507.05 ha was chosen in such way as to capture the diversity of site conditions encountered in the mountain forests of mixed beech and coniferous stands in the area [22]. The working method was tested on the key area (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, stands will be able to maintain their vitality and their capacity for regeneration at any moment in their existence. The natural regeneration of mixed stands also creates the premise of being able to capitalize on local provenances that are much better adapted to the prevailing environmental conditions [40]. Such characteristics should constitute targets for silvicultural work on the future structures of fir and beech mixed forests.…”
Section: Practical Utility Of Volume Increment Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In carrying out the research, the division of the forest in compartments (subcompartments) was taken into account. All existing compartments were reviewed and verified with the aim of maintaining the same site conditions [27,28]. These development units were grouped in homogeneous units in terms of climate, trophicity, and water.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%