Adapting Urban Water Systems to Manage Scarcity in the 21st Century: The Case of Los Angeles

Abstract

Acute water shortages for large metropolitan regions are likely to become more frequent as climate changes impact historic precipitation levels and urban population grows. California and Los Angeles County have just experienced a severe four year drought followed by a year of high precipitation, and likely drought conditions again in Southern California. We show how the embedded preferences for distant sources, and their local manifestations, have created and/or exacerbated fluctuations in local water availability and suboptimal management. As a socio technical system, water management in the Los Angeles metropolitan region has created a kind of scarcity lock-in in years of low rainfall. We come to this through a decade of coupled research examining landscapes and water use, the development of the complex institutional water management infrastructure, hydrology and a systems network model. Such integrated research is a model for other regions to unpack and understand the actual water resources of a metropolitan region, how it is managed and potential ability to become more water self reliant if the institutions collaborate and manage the resource both parsimoniously, but also in an integrated and conjunctive manner. The Los Angeles County metropolitan region, we find, could transition to a nearly water self sufficient system. Keywords Water scarcity • Socio-technical systems • Integrated water management • Water self-reliance

Energy use for urban water management by utilities and households in Los Angeles

“…It includes 25 years of calibrated monthly rainfall and runoff estimates. The model has previously been used to assess multiple aspects of water supply and demand management in the region (Porse et al 2018a, 2018b, Pincetl et al 2019. A full description of the formulation, data, and assumptions used in developing the model are available in previous studies and the Supporting Information for this article.…”

Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA

“…The lack of an irrigation × species interaction may correspond to both treatments being relatively dry and most not having reached full canopy coverage. Alternatively, low-input species such as those used in this study may not be as responsive to higher soil moisture; therefore, further study with a broader range of irrigation treatments may be necessary to understand production needs of these plants (Hilaire et al 2008;Pincetl et al 2018;Wang et al 2014).…”

Estimating Future Surface Water Availability Through an Integrated Climate‐Hydrology‐Management Modeling Framework at a Basin Scale Under CMIP6 Scenarios

“…The situation could be especially dire in cities that rely primarily on surface water resources, which are inherently more susceptible to the consequences of climate change. Examples of such cities include Bangalore in India, Melbourne in Australia, Shanghai in China, and Los Angeles in the U.S. (Hegde & Chandra, 2012; Li et al., 2017; Pincetl et al., 2019; Timbal et al., 2015). Additionally, urban areas in Texas are facing significant challenges with water availability due to factors like a semi‐arid climate, rapid population growth, and increased vulnerability to water availability variations under climate change (Nielsen‐Gammon et al., 2020).…”