Adapting Web-based Instruction to Residents’ Knowledge Improves Learning Efficiency

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Increased clinical demands and decreased available time accentuate the need for efficient learning in postgraduate medical training. Adapting Web-based learning (WBL) to learners' prior knowledge may improve efficiency. OBJECTIVE:We hypothesized that time spent learning would be shorter and test scores not adversely affected for residents who used a WBL intervention that adapted to prior knowledge. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover trial.SETTING: Academic internal medicine residency program continuity clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 122 internal medicine residents.INTERVENTIONS: Four WBL modules on ambulatory medicine were developed in standard and adaptive formats. The adaptive format allowed learners who correctly answered case-based questions to skip the corresponding content. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:The measurements were knowledge posttest, time spent on modules, and format preference. One hundred twenty-two residents completed at least 1 module, and 111 completed all 4. Knowledge scores were similar between the adaptive format (mean±standard error of the mean, 76.2±0.9) and standard (77.2±0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference −3.0 to 1.0, P=.34). However, time spent was lower for the adaptive format (29.3 minutes [CI 26.0 to 33.0] per module) than for the standard (35.6 [31.6 to 40.3]), an 18% decrease in time (CI 9 to 26%, P=.0003). Seventy-two of 96 respondents (75%) preferred the adaptive format.CONCLUSIONS: Adapting WBL to learners' prior knowledge can reduce learning time without adversely affecting knowledge scores, suggesting greater learning efficiency. In an era where reduced duty hours and growing clinical demands on trainees and faculty limit the time available for learning, such efficiencies will be increasingly important. For clinical trial registration, see

Time and learning efficiency in Internet-based learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…From 2,704 articles identified in our search, we included 20 articles describing 22 distinct comparisons (two articles described two comparisons each): Bell et al 2000;Blackmore et al 2006;Cook et al 2005Cook et al , 2006Cook et al , 2008aCook et al , b, 2009bDennis 2003;Friedl et al 2006a, b;Grundman et al 2000;Kopp et al 2008;Leong et al 2003;Mattheos et al 2004;Nicholson et al 2006;Papa et al 1999;Schittek Janda et al 2005;Spickard et al 2002and Tunuguntla et al 2008. We contacted and received additional information from authors of three studies (Nicholson et al 2006;Papa et al 1999;Tunuguntla et al 2008).…”

Addressing the systems-based practice requirement with health policy content and educational technology

“…As demonstrated in previous studies (Kerfoot et al 2007;Cook et al 2008;Pereira et al 2008), the web/podcast participants were as successful on their post-test as those participating in the live lecture (although it is not known how those who did not complete the post-test would have performed, as mentioned in the ''Study limitations'' section). The participants in this study are part of generation ''y'' and ''x'' (Sandars & Morrison 2007).…”

Navigating the JGIM Special Issue on Medical Education

“…Web-based learning modules that adapted to residents' prior knowledge decreased the time on task without a decrement in knowledge test scores. 28 Use of interactive spaced education to teach the physical examination significantly enhanced learning outcomes. 29 Visual literacy training with art improved physical observation skills.…”