2010
DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2010.542620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting Web content for low-literacy readers by using lexical elaboration and named entities labeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Educational FACILITA was a web application prototype which offered lexical elaborations and named entity labelling. A pilot study with low-literacy users reported improved text comprehension, though participants reported to be sometimes confused with the offered list of synonyms that had multiple meanings (Watanabe et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ats Projects For Social Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational FACILITA was a web application prototype which offered lexical elaborations and named entity labelling. A pilot study with low-literacy users reported improved text comprehension, though participants reported to be sometimes confused with the offered list of synonyms that had multiple meanings (Watanabe et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ats Projects For Social Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when identifying complex words for individuals outside of their intended target population or domain, lexicon-based approaches perform less well [120]. For example, FACILITA [174] is designed to distinguish between Portuguese complex and non-complex words for Brazilian children using three dictionaries: (1) consisted of frequent words extracted from Brazilian newspapers, (2) contained concrete words, and (3) housed simple words that were believed to be "common to youngsters" [10]. FACILITA is very effective in helping young low literacy readers in Brazil.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lexical simplification (LS) is the process of substituting complex words or phrases with their simpler variants. It is an important factor in making texts more accessible for people with aphasia (Carroll et al, 1998;Devlin and Unthank, 2006;, dyslexia (Rello et al, 2013b,a), autism spectrum disorders (Orȃsan et al, 2018), cognitive impairments (Feng et al, 2009;Saggion et al, 2015), low literacy levels (Aluísio et al, 2008;Watanabe et al, 2010), deaf and hard-ofhearing people (Inui et al, 2003;Alonzo et al, 2020), children (De Belder et al, 2010), and nonnative speakers (Hirsh and Nation, 1992;Heilman et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%