Adaptive and automated fault-tolerance for multi-agent systems

Singh, Aarti; Juneja, Dimple; Sharma, Ashok Kumar

doi:10.1109/csae.2011.5952430

Cited by 1 publication

(5 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Singh et al [16] chose an automatic and adaptive fault recovery and central fault management technique. They tried to min imize system crashes, agent failures and critical agent failure.…”

Section: Discussion Of Evaluations and Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here in this section we have described the different app ro ach es and their p ros & co ns us ing d ifferen t parameters as given above [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. In this section we find out the advantages and d isadvantages of th e fau lt to lerance approaches that we surveyed in the literature review.…”

Section: Pros and Cons Of Existing Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Singh, Aart i et al [16] have provided auto matic and adaptive fault recovery for the multi-agent system. Characteristics of these approaches are a local view and autonomy.…”

Section: Qualitative Comparison Of Ftmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Singh et al [16] have proposed this framework fo r a critical agent in the mult i-agent system (MAS), based on the cardinality of an agent. So metimes rep licat ion can become very costly due to the complexity of the system; moreover, dynamic replication is also a need of all agents in fault to lerance MAS.…”

Section: F Adaptive and Automated Ftmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Singh et al [16] Automatic and adaptive fault recovery, central fault Management i) Using this approach, it provides automatic recovery for faults when they occur and adaptive fault recovery.…”

Section: Re Search Paper Technique Pros Consmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Survey on Fault Tolerant Multi Agent System

Arfat¹,

Eassa²

2016

IJITCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-A mult i-agent system (MAS) is formed by a number of agents connected together to achieve the desired goals specified by the design. Usually in a mu lti agent system, agents work on behalf of a user to accomplish given goals. In MAS co-ordination, co-operation, negotiation and communication are important aspects to achieve fault tolerance in MAS. The mu lti-agent system is likely to fail in a distributed environment and as an outcome o f such, the resources for MAS may not be available due to the failure of an agent, mach ine crashes, process failure, software failure, communicat ion failure and/or hardware failure. Therefore, many researchers have proposed fault tolerance approaches to overcome the failure in MAS. So we have surveyed these approaches in this paper, whereby our contribution is threefold. Firstly, we have provided taxono my of faults and techniques in MAS. Secondly, we have provided a qualitative comparison of existing fault tolerance approaches. Thirdly, we have provided an evaluation of existing fau lt tolerance techniques. Results show that most of the existing schemes are not very efficient, due to various reasons like high computation costs, costly replication and large co mmunicat ion overheads.

show abstract

“…Singh et al [16] chose an automatic and adaptive fault recovery and central fault management technique. They tried to min imize system crashes, agent failures and critical agent failure.…”

Section: Discussion Of Evaluations and Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Pros and Cons Of Existing Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Singh, Aart i et al [16] have provided auto matic and adaptive fault recovery for the multi-agent system. Characteristics of these approaches are a local view and autonomy.…”

Section: Qualitative Comparison Of Ftmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: F Adaptive and Automated Ftmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Re Search Paper Technique Pros Consmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations