2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2016.7795598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive and efficient lane change path planning for automated vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The past decades have witnessed a great progress in trajectory planning. Many researches have been proposed and studied [3], [9]- [11] that they can generate global trajectories connecting a start and a possibly distant end state. Some approaches for trajectory planning follow a discrete sampling or a road map-based scheme [12] [13], which firstly sample multiple rows of points and then generate a finite set of trajectories with cost values, typically by differential functions that describe vehicle dynamics and kinematics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past decades have witnessed a great progress in trajectory planning. Many researches have been proposed and studied [3], [9]- [11] that they can generate global trajectories connecting a start and a possibly distant end state. Some approaches for trajectory planning follow a discrete sampling or a road map-based scheme [12] [13], which firstly sample multiple rows of points and then generate a finite set of trajectories with cost values, typically by differential functions that describe vehicle dynamics and kinematics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A completely different approach to solving the path planning problem is multi-agent systems, where the necessary calculations are distributed among different units [14]. Most of the path planning approaches plan several paths, evaluate these and choose the best [5,15], but there are also approaches, which plan only one path and iteratively improve this path [16]. Because path planning can become computationally burdensome, a considerable amount of research was done to parallelize it.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few researches only assumed that the acceleration and velocity at the starting and ending points were zeros to generate the PC-based lateral trajectory model (Resende & Nashashibi, 2010;Wang & Zheng, 2013;You et al, 2015;Ntousakis et al, 2016;Chebly et al, 2017). Heil et al (2016) developed the PC-based LCT planning and found the computational cost by using maximum acceleration and overshooting behaviour. Connors and Elkaim (2007) had successfully overcome collision points during LC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%