1983
DOI: 10.1049/ip-f-1.1983.0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive canceller for elevation angle estimation in the presence of multipath

Abstract: The paper describes a new adaptive canceller for estimating the elevation angle in a low-angle tracking radar environment in the presence of specular and diffuse multipath. The adaptation is achieved using the complex least-mean-squares (LMS) algorithm. Computer-simulation results are included to demonstrate the usefulness of this scheme for estimating the elevation angle when it is a small fraction of a standard beamwidth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem has attracted the attention of many researchers in the field of radar because of its importance [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The simplest solution so far is given by Cantrell et al [2] and Gordon [3], who derived a formula for the maximum-likelihood angle estimator (MLE) which involves the solution of a quartic equation for the nonsymmetric case and a quadratic equation for the symmetric case (the target and its image located symmetrically about the centre of the aperture pattern in the elevation plane).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has attracted the attention of many researchers in the field of radar because of its importance [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The simplest solution so far is given by Cantrell et al [2] and Gordon [3], who derived a formula for the maximum-likelihood angle estimator (MLE) which involves the solution of a quartic equation for the nonsymmetric case and a quadratic equation for the symmetric case (the target and its image located symmetrically about the centre of the aperture pattern in the elevation plane).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%