2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5796-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Capacity, Adaptive Governance and Resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Governance may firstly be understood as a normative concept, which advocates that government organisations should work with stakeholders and society in political steering processes (Hill 2013). It represents a 'shift from government to governance' (Walker 2014), that is, from rigid forms of rule enforcement to more flexible and interactive mechanisms of public engagement and supposedly shared decision-making.…”
Section: Water Governance As a Normative And Analytical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governance may firstly be understood as a normative concept, which advocates that government organisations should work with stakeholders and society in political steering processes (Hill 2013). It represents a 'shift from government to governance' (Walker 2014), that is, from rigid forms of rule enforcement to more flexible and interactive mechanisms of public engagement and supposedly shared decision-making.…”
Section: Water Governance As a Normative And Analytical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarship exploring the links between mitigation, adaptation, socioecological resilience and SD more generally, has generally pointed toward the existence of (potential) synergies and tradeoffs within and across policy sectors and across implementation measures (Gallopín, 2006;Rosenzweig and Tubiello, 2007;Vogel et al, 2007;Boyd et al, 2009;Thornton and Gerber, 2010;Adger et al, 2011;Warren, 2011;Lal et al, 2011;Vermeulen et al, 2012;Denton and Wilbanks, 2014;Hill, 2013). These studies show that, in spite of mitigative and adaptive capacities being so closely intertwined with each other and with SD, the relationship between mitigation and adaptation measures is more ambiguous and, in line with the AR4, suggest that outcomes are highly dependent on the measures and the context in which they are undertaken, with some policy sectors being more conducive to synergies than others.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergent adaptation is the process by which one group's adaptation to climate hazards reduces another's adaptive capacity and may result in coupled conflict-cooperation dynamics or exacerbate inequities (Hoque et al 2018;Sovacool et al 2015;Snorek et al 2017;Sovacool 2018). Building adaptive capacity for all and avoiding divergent adaptation are related to institutions, which have been shown to have a direct influence on adaptive capacity (Olsson and Folke 2004;Adger et al 2006;Hill 2013;Gupta et al 2010;Berman and Paavola 2012). Institutions are the informal and formal rules, values, norms, and cognitive processes that constrain individual and collective behavior as well as access to resources and information (Dennett 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%