2016
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.2016.5155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive capacity of female rabbits submitted to a change in breeding practices

Abstract: The aim of this study was to test the consequences of a change in breeding practices on 219 multiparous rabbit does over 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The KR (on average 70.1 %) was consequently 2.1 % lower. In the given analysis, the KR was also lower than that reported by Castellini et al (2010), Manal (2010), Gerencsér et al (2011), Coutelet (2015, and Theau-Clément et al (2016). Furthermore, the LS was relatively low compared with results from the literature concerning the breeding goals of modern hybrid rabbit strains (Coutelet, 2015;Maertens and Buys, 2015;Maertens and De Bie, 2017).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KR (on average 70.1 %) was consequently 2.1 % lower. In the given analysis, the KR was also lower than that reported by Castellini et al (2010), Manal (2010), Gerencsér et al (2011), Coutelet (2015, and Theau-Clément et al (2016). Furthermore, the LS was relatively low compared with results from the literature concerning the breeding goals of modern hybrid rabbit strains (Coutelet, 2015;Maertens and Buys, 2015;Maertens and De Bie, 2017).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Schüddemage (1999), Carluccio et al (2004) and Coutelet (2015) found respective pregnancy rates between 64 % and more than 80 % and an average LS of between 8.1 and 10.7 total kits born in different breeds. In practice, the KR is lower than the conception rate and varies widely between 29 % and 90 % (Dimitrova et al, 2009;Castellini et al, 2010;Manal, 2010;Gerencsér et al, 2011;Coutelet, 2015;Theau-Clément et al, 2016). It has been previously shown that housing and feeding are factors which influence reproductive performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%