2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Changes After 2 Weeks of 10-s Sprint Interval Training With Various Recovery Times

Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of applying two different rest recovery times in a 10-s sprint interval training session on aerobic and anaerobic capacities as well as skeletal muscle enzyme activities.Methods: Fourteen physically active but not highly trained male subjects (mean maximal oxygen uptake 50.5 ± 1.0 mlO2·kg−1·min−1) participated in the study. The training protocol involved a series of 10-s sprints separated by either 1-min (SIT10:1) or 4-min (SIT10:4) of recovery. The numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After a standard warm-up, all subjects performed a 30 s “all-out” supramaximal test on a mechanically braked cycle ergometer (884E Sprint Bike, Monark, Vansbro, Sweden). The test was initiated from a dead stop with the resistance equal to 75 g·kg body mass −1 (corresponding to 7.5% of an individual’s body mass) preset on the ergometer’s friction belt [ 31 , 32 ]. The obtained results were analyzed for maximal anaerobic power (MAnP) and work output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a standard warm-up, all subjects performed a 30 s “all-out” supramaximal test on a mechanically braked cycle ergometer (884E Sprint Bike, Monark, Vansbro, Sweden). The test was initiated from a dead stop with the resistance equal to 75 g·kg body mass −1 (corresponding to 7.5% of an individual’s body mass) preset on the ergometer’s friction belt [ 31 , 32 ]. The obtained results were analyzed for maximal anaerobic power (MAnP) and work output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect size (η 2 ) has also been calculated. The value of η 2 has been interpreted as follows: 0.1 a small effect, 0.3 a medium effect, and 0.5 a large effect, as previously described [ 32 ]. Changes (delta) in both groups were compared using an independent samples t -test or a U-Mann–Whitney test, according to the data distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a 5-min warm-up, all subjects performed a 30-s "allout" WAnT on a mechanically braked cycle ergometer (884E Sprint Bike; Monark, Vansbro, Sweden). The test was initiated from a dead stop with the resistance equal to 75 g • kg body mass − 1 (corresponding to 7.5 % of an individual's body mass) preset on the ergometer's friction belt [14]. Then all subjects underwent familiarization of both tests.…”
Section: Familiarization Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research based on a two-week training program proved that 10-s bouts (with 4-min recovery) effectively improve cardiorespiratory fitness relative to the "classic SIT" protocol (so called Wingate) composed of 4-6 × 30-s cycle ergometer bouts with 4-min recovery phases [6]. Another research project indicates that reducing the recovery time to one minute leads to an expansion of aerobic and anaerobic efficiency following a 2-week training program similar to the one generated by the 4-min recovery protocol [7]. Furthermore, only the protocol with shorter recovery periods reduced fatigue (power drop) during maximal anaerobic exercise (Wingate test) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another research project indicates that reducing the recovery time to one minute leads to an expansion of aerobic and anaerobic efficiency following a 2-week training program similar to the one generated by the 4-min recovery protocol [7]. Furthermore, only the protocol with shorter recovery periods reduced fatigue (power drop) during maximal anaerobic exercise (Wingate test) [7]. In addition, a 3-week training program with 30-s recovery periods brought about a more significant improvement in the endurance test results than training with 80-and 120-s recovery phases [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%