2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-018-2160-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive clustering based breast cancer detection with ANFIS classifier using mammographic images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, although ANFIS has provided promising results in brain cancer detection (Chatterjee & Das, 2019; Selvapandian & Manivannam, 2018; Thirumurugan & Shanthakumar, 2016) and in mammography‐based breast cancer detection (Addeh et al, 2018; Padmavathy et al, 2018; Sujatha et al, 2020) it has never been applied to breast DCE‐MRI data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the literature, although ANFIS has provided promising results in brain cancer detection (Chatterjee & Das, 2019; Selvapandian & Manivannam, 2018; Thirumurugan & Shanthakumar, 2016) and in mammography‐based breast cancer detection (Addeh et al, 2018; Padmavathy et al, 2018; Sujatha et al, 2020) it has never been applied to breast DCE‐MRI data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, an ANFIS feature selection method was proposed for breast cancer detection (Addeh et al, 2018) based on the row data of Breast Cancer Wisconsin (WBCD) dataset. Additionally, ANFIS was used for breast cancer detection in mammographic images that are non‐subsampled shearlet transform (NSST) pre‐processed (Padmavathy et al, 2018). Furthermore, it has been used as a classifier in mammograms based on texture features (Fernandes et al, 2010; Sujatha et al, 2020), but also based on the combination of shape and textural features (Bhattacharya & Das, 2009 Bhattacharya & Das, 2010) and also based on features extracted by a genetic algorithm (Das & Bhattacharya, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workflow of the proposed method bone cancer detection 15 the accuracy was 93%. Breast cancer detection 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , the detection was never better and the ANFIS classifier achieved an accuracy of the range 91%-99% . Finally, in chest diseases detection 20 , 21 ,the performance accuracy was around 98%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, Suresh et al [ 49 ] and Sapate et al [ 50 ] employ a fuzzy-based strategy to cluster all the pixels with similar features in order to detect all the zones that have differences. Other strategies involve the utilization of mathematical morphology [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], image contrast and intensity [ 56 , 57 ], geometrical features [ 58 , 59 ], correlation and convolution [ 60 , 61 ], non-linear filtering [ 62 , 63 ], texture features [ 64 ], deep learning [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ], entropy [ 70 , 71 ], among other strategies. It is worth noticing that from the diversity of the employed strategies, some of them still require an initial guidance to detect the suspicious zones, either by manually selecting pixels inside of the zone or using the radiologist notes about the localization.…”
Section: Image Processing and Classification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%