2010
DOI: 10.1080/01431160902882561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive clustering of airborne LiDAR data to segment individual tree crowns in managed pine forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
101
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the crown diameter estimation, the R 2 values for CDs (x direction, y direction, and average) are larger than 0.9 in the two case studies, which are much better than the results reported by using ALS data, i.e., 0.44 reported in [50] and 0.63 reported in [48]. It should be noted that previous studies on the crown diameter estimation by using ALS data mostly focus on natural forest regions.…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…For the crown diameter estimation, the R 2 values for CDs (x direction, y direction, and average) are larger than 0.9 in the two case studies, which are much better than the results reported by using ALS data, i.e., 0.44 reported in [50] and 0.63 reported in [48]. It should be noted that previous studies on the crown diameter estimation by using ALS data mostly focus on natural forest regions.…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…An adequate identification of suppressed trees relies on the analysis of full-waveform or laser-point data ( [11,12,17]). A 3D delineation is possible using voxel-based or vector-based approaches, for example multi-layer imaging techniques [18], variants of k-means clustering [19][20][21], adaptive 3D clustering [22], multi-scale clustering [23] or graph-based methods [2,12]. Generally the 3D approaches result in improved detection rates in vertically inhomogeneous forest stands and more complex and realistic crown shapes [9] compared to raster-based approaches.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…× TP recall = 100% TP + FN (11) × TP precision = 100% TP + FP (12) × 2TP F -Measure = 100% 2TP + FP + FN (13) …”
Section: Accuracy Assessment and Evaluation Of The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has become an increasingly popular tool for forest monitoring and vegetation mapping tasks for its capacity of obtaining the spatial distribution of surface characteristics with dense point clouds [1][2][3]. Extensive studies have been investigated to estimate forest attributes from point clouds, including tree locations [4], heights [5][6][7], DBH [8], stem curves [9], crown widths [5,[10][11][12], crown base heights [13,14], wood volumes [15,16] and biomass [17][18][19][20]. Moreover, the improvement in LiDAR technology of higher pulse rates and the increasing LiDAR posting densities have provided better opportunities for obtaining forest data at a fine scale, and the forest inventory has transferred from an average forest stand scale to the individual tree level [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%