2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01186-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Coincidence Detection and Dynamic Gain Control in Visual Cortical Neurons In Vivo

Abstract: Several theories have proposed a functional role for response synchronization in sensory perception. Critics of these theories have argued that selective synchronization is physiologically implausible when cortical networks operate at high levels of activity. Using intracellular recordings from visual cortex in vivo, in combination with numerical simulations, we find dynamic changes in spike threshold that reduce cellular sensitivity to slow depolarizations and concurrently increase the relative sensitivity to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
257
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
20
257
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Synaptic unreliability might argue against the preservation of information on this temporal scale (2), but the mere fact that the synchronous activity is found on this, or even finer, time scales (38) proves this is not an obstacle for a coding system that is based on synchrony (40). Synaptic unreliability is overcome through coincident inputs (6), temporal integration and synaptic facilitation (12,19), oscillations (7), and activity-dependent changes in integration times (21,38,(41)(42)(43). These mechanisms can maintain and propagate synchrony throughout the visual hierarchy to form new synchronized assemblies at the perceptual level (4-7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synaptic unreliability might argue against the preservation of information on this temporal scale (2), but the mere fact that the synchronous activity is found on this, or even finer, time scales (38) proves this is not an obstacle for a coding system that is based on synchrony (40). Synaptic unreliability is overcome through coincident inputs (6), temporal integration and synaptic facilitation (12,19), oscillations (7), and activity-dependent changes in integration times (21,38,(41)(42)(43). These mechanisms can maintain and propagate synchrony throughout the visual hierarchy to form new synchronized assemblies at the perceptual level (4-7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This focusing will increase the impact of that spiking activity onto postsynaptic target neurons, because the latter act as coincidence detectors (1,4,6,28,29). When those target neurons get entrained to the input rhythm, they will undergo correlated excitability fluctuations and this will likely further increase the impact of the most gamma-locked spikes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tight coordination between excitation and inhibition generates steep membrane potential slopes at particular phases of the gamma cycle. Those fast membrane depolarizations are crucial in triggering postsynaptic spikes (1,28) and thereby crucial in closing a reverberant cortical loop. It is important to note that the tight coordination of excitation and inhibition quenches noisy slow fluctuations in synaptic input (35) and thereby reduces the noise in the cell's output and most likely also the noise correlation among neighboring cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spike generation has been shown to be dependent on the temporal microstructure of membrane potential fluctuations. High frequency fluctuations in membrane potential lead to higher firing rates, whereas spike rates are lower for the same mean membrane potential without rapid fluctuations [5,6,71,72]. Furthermore, the membrane potential contains more high frequency fluctuations in response to the preferred orientation than in response to non-preferred orientations [6,72].…”
Section: Mechanisms Regulating Spike Tuning Near Pinwheel Centersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency fluctuations in membrane potential lead to higher firing rates, whereas spike rates are lower for the same mean membrane potential without rapid fluctuations [5,6,71,72]. Furthermore, the membrane potential contains more high frequency fluctuations in response to the preferred orientation than in response to non-preferred orientations [6,72]. In fact, the tuning curve of high frequency components of the membrane potential are more similar to the firing rate tuning curves than are the tuning curves of other slower components of the subthreshold response.…”
Section: Mechanisms Regulating Spike Tuning Near Pinwheel Centersmentioning
confidence: 99%