2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2021.3107357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive-Constrained Impedance Control for Human–Robot Co-Transportation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common contactless devices in teleoperation are low-cost RGB cameras. Making use of human body tracking and hand pose estimation algorithms, markerless vision-based teleoperation has been studied in controlling humanoid robots or dexterous robotic hands [24]. Many works separately research the visual perception of human bodies (e.g., human gesture classification or human hand pose estimation) and robot control (e.g., specific motions or kinematic retargeting) [25], [26].…”
Section: A Robotic Teleoperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common contactless devices in teleoperation are low-cost RGB cameras. Making use of human body tracking and hand pose estimation algorithms, markerless vision-based teleoperation has been studied in controlling humanoid robots or dexterous robotic hands [24]. Many works separately research the visual perception of human bodies (e.g., human gesture classification or human hand pose estimation) and robot control (e.g., specific motions or kinematic retargeting) [25], [26].…”
Section: A Robotic Teleoperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the patient's condition and different rehabilitation training stages, different rehabilitation training modes need to be adopted, and corresponding control methods should also be used (Table 1 passive control mode is aimed at patients with severe diseases and weak muscle strength; here, the affected limbs are driven by the robot to move along a predetermined trajectory. From the perspective of robot control, robots perform trajectory tracking tasks in passive training, which can be achieved through trajectory tracking control methods, such as proportional−derivative (PD) control [79], computational torque control [62], variable structure control [80] and impedance control [81]. The controller mentioned above does not take humans into account; that is, the trajectory tracking control realised focuses on the movement of the robot and the tracking of expected motion.…”
Section: Human-robot Coordinate Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the trajectory is no longer pre-set, but can be obtained by real-time reference changes [97,98]. A finite-state machine defines different motion Passive control Proportional−derivative (PD) control [79], computational torque control [62], variable structure control [80], impedance control [81], multiple input multiple output (MIMO) decoupling control [51] After a walk mode based on the sensors was selected, the participant initiated and propagated the programmed motions. The torque that the robot needs to apply to the human body is generally put into the dynamics equation as a disturbance term Assist-as-needed control Force-field control (FFC) [5], moment-field control (MFC) [82], three-dimensional-force-field control (3D-FFC) [83] Using physical sensors for measurement and evaluation; that is, the actual position or attitude deviation measured by the sensor can obtain the corresponding adjustment force/torque to achieve impedance control based on the attitude deviation Neuromuscular control [57] Capturing EMG signals to generate a synchronised and natural gait and achieve human-robot coordinated control Force control Finite state machine [84] A finite state machine is used to indicate the intended option of a series of manoeuvres.…”
Section: Human-robot Coordinate Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, joint angular variables of fault joints may not be directly involved in the redundancy resolution without any additional constraints. It is different from the way of processing in good working status for redundant robots, that is, motion planning and control of end-effectors in the workspace can be done through directly seeking control actions of all the joints in the way of redundancy resolution [6,7,8], and motion planning and control of redundant robots in normal working conditions have already achieved great success [9] with many efficient approaches have been developed under different scenarios [10,11]. Some academics have developed fault-tolerant analysis and motion planning methodologies in the past several years in order to find realistic solutions for redundant robots to overcome the difficulties of generalizing analytical solutions from Cartesian space to joint space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%