2004
DOI: 10.1163/1568553042225732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive control of free-floating space robots in Cartesian coordinates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the paper, the model of the two degrees of freedom robot satellite system with floating base is taken as the simulation object, shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b). Two cases are simulated in the paper, one is the case of adaptive control in Parlaktuna and Ozkan 14 and the other is the case of adaptive variable structure control proposed in the paper. Similar to this paper, an adaptive controller is proposed by Parlaktuna and Ozkan for free-floating space robots in Cartesian coordinates.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the paper, the model of the two degrees of freedom robot satellite system with floating base is taken as the simulation object, shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b). Two cases are simulated in the paper, one is the case of adaptive control in Parlaktuna and Ozkan 14 and the other is the case of adaptive variable structure control proposed in the paper. Similar to this paper, an adaptive controller is proposed by Parlaktuna and Ozkan for free-floating space robots in Cartesian coordinates.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method creates an augmentation variable composed of the parameters of the end of the manipulator and the joints, which makes the inertial parameters of the system dynamics equation accord with the linear rule. Parlaktuna and Ozkan 14 studied an indirect adaptive control strategy based on the extended manipulator, but all the controller parameters of the strategy also need to be estimated on line, so the amount of the calculation is huge and the reversibility of the inertia matrix adopting the inverse dynamics method cannot be ensured. In addition, adaptive control is only effective for the issues of parametric uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the measurement of the spacecraft angular acceleration and the manipulator joint accelerations during the dynamic parameter estimation, using the filtering technique [26] to act on both sides of (4) and (5), we get the filtered dynamic model [12] …”
Section: Kinematic and Dynamic Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly caused by the nonlinearly parametric feature of the dynamics of free-floating manipulators (i.e., the FFSM dynamics cannot be expressed linearly with respect to a group of physical parameters) [9]. One possible solution to this problem is the normal form augmentation based approach [11,12], which achieves inertia-space trajectory tracking of free-floating manipulator systems with dynamic uncertainties. Its major deficiency is the requirement of measurement of the spacecraft acceleration and moreover the stringent condition (due to the use of the spacecraft acceleration in the control) under which this controller can work seems not intuitively understandable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Fu et al (2007)], on the other hand, established an off-line adaptive estimator to provide accurate identified parameters to a dynamic control law. In order to cope with the nonlinear parameterization problem of the dynamic model of the free-floating space robot system, [Gu & Xu (1993)], [Parlaktuna & Ozkan (2004)] and [Fu et al (2007)] have modeled the system as an extended arm, and [Abiko & Hirzinger (2009)] used the inverted chain approach to explicitly describe the coupled dynamics between the end-effector and the robot arm. This chapter deals with the problem of robust trajectory tracking control in task space for free-floating manipulator systems subject to plant uncertainties and external disturbances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%