2020
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2019.2955425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Control Strategies for Urban Network Traffic via a Decentralized Approach With User-Optimal Routing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another proposed approach was to adjust route-choice in a first stage, either off-line or in real-time, and account for it when adjusting signal timing. In [5] drivers are informed about prevailing conditions and undertake the shortest path updated on a node by node basis. A decentralized controller then computes signal plans based on route-choice information captured through turning ratios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another proposed approach was to adjust route-choice in a first stage, either off-line or in real-time, and account for it when adjusting signal timing. In [5] drivers are informed about prevailing conditions and undertake the shortest path updated on a node by node basis. A decentralized controller then computes signal plans based on route-choice information captured through turning ratios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the signal times change dynamically, the UE is not known beforehand. Achieving Dynamic User Equilibrium is challenging due to transient nature of traffic, especially when considering a relatively small control horizon [5].…”
Section: B Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the result of the decentralization, these approaches are scalable and can be real-time; however, rather than global optimization, they mostly locally control signals and may find a suboptimal solution [8,[18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e decentralized approach reaches an optimal level of about 22%. In [19], they present an alternative decentralized solution approach based on the neighbourhood concept, analyzing a real urban network of 58 signal-controlled. e discrepancies between the centralized and decentralized controllers are about 20%-30% with a reduction to 8%-15% once the network traffic router is introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%