2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive current-flow models of ECT: Explaining individual static impedance, dynamic impedance, and brain current density

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currents used in ECT are 2–3 orders of magnitude higher, specifically 600–800 mA in this case. It is a well-known phenomenon in physics that much lower impedances are measured at higher currents (a so called “electrical breakdown” of impedance) [ 4 ]. Indeed this effect can also be observed with each individual ECT, because the so-called “static” impedance, which is measured before the stimulus current application, typically lies around 1000–2000 ohms, whereas during the current application the impedance is typically between 200 and 250 ohms.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currents used in ECT are 2–3 orders of magnitude higher, specifically 600–800 mA in this case. It is a well-known phenomenon in physics that much lower impedances are measured at higher currents (a so called “electrical breakdown” of impedance) [ 4 ]. Indeed this effect can also be observed with each individual ECT, because the so-called “static” impedance, which is measured before the stimulus current application, typically lies around 1000–2000 ohms, whereas during the current application the impedance is typically between 200 and 250 ohms.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sine wave vs. short rectangular pulses)) would have to be known as accurately as possible for each individual voxel of the brain to enable correct finite element modeling. Moreover, it is highly likely that strong direction-dependent effects, for example within the white matter tracts, play an additional role in the final modeling of the electric field [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that, as a rule of thumb, any implanted metal in the head can be electrically modeled as a perfect insulator in the context of tES or TMS. In ECT the electric field reaches higher values (above 4500 V/m at the scalp [29]). In this case, the choice of the correct electrical model for an implant may not be straightforward as it will depend on its geometry and how strong the electric field is expected to be in its location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, could give information about possible therapeutic targets. Researchers could also create models for explaining and understanding mechanisms associated with the therapeutic response, like neuromodulation strategies such as ECT ( 138 ).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%