2002
DOI: 10.1002/nme.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive damping for dynamic relaxation problems with non‐monotonic spectral response

Abstract: SUMMARYNon-inertial transients may be e ectively solved using explicit time integration with arbitrary inertial and damping properties. The usual approach relies on a diagonal lumped mass on which strictly mass proportional damping is based. While the damping coe cient can be adaptively determined on the basis of the estimated frequency of the predominant response, local changes in sti ness, often associated with changing contact conditions, can cause abrupt changes in the damping coe cient. This can substanti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of critically damping the system of equations from the beginning, as suggested by all the standard DR procedures, the motion is kept as strong as possible through underdamping the system, so that the local movement provoked at the loading area or at the crack tip can spread to the rest of the system. No-damping or low damping would not work since this may lead to a persistent noisy response (Metzger 2003). By under-damping the system the convergence process is enhanced, but at the same time, the risk of overshooting is also increased.…”
Section: The Modified Concept To Apply the Dr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of critically damping the system of equations from the beginning, as suggested by all the standard DR procedures, the motion is kept as strong as possible through underdamping the system, so that the local movement provoked at the loading area or at the crack tip can spread to the rest of the system. No-damping or low damping would not work since this may lead to a persistent noisy response (Metzger 2003). By under-damping the system the convergence process is enhanced, but at the same time, the risk of overshooting is also increased.…”
Section: The Modified Concept To Apply the Dr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The standard estimation of the critical damping coefficient through Rayleigh's quotient damps the system from higher frequency modes to lower frequency modes, therefore avoids overshooting the solutions sought. However, during the calculations for non-linear problems, when the estimation gives a higher frequency mode, the damping coefficient adopted will over-damp the global motion and actually stall the system, making the convergence rate unacceptably slow (Metzger 2003). We adopt a modified technique illustrated in Yu and Ruiz (2004) in order to sidestep this difficulty.…”
Section: The Modified Concept To Apply the Dr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Underestimating ωminn leads to an underdamped response, which increases the number of iterations. On the other hand, overestimating ωminn yields an overdamped vibration, which, as reported in , could impede the convergence even more than the underdamped case. Performing nonproductive iterations is one of the classical approaches for estimation of critical damping .…”
Section: Viscous Dynamic Relaxation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, damping is a key parameter in the DR method. Overdamping or underdamping impedes the convergences to a stable equilibrium state (Metzger, 2003). Various approaches to the selection of the foregoing parameters have been published in the literature (Underwood, 1983;Kadkhodayan et al, 2008;Metzger, 2003;Papadrakakis, 1981;Rezaiee-pajand and Alamatian, 2010).…”
Section: Fictitious Masses and Kinetic Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%