2005
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2005.852453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive decentralized control of robot manipulators driven by current-fed induction motors

Abstract: In this paper, an adaptive decentralized control scheme with a rotor-flux observer is proposed for the tracking control of robot manipulators actuated by current-fed induction motors. To cope with all parametric uncertainties in the electromechanical systems, an adaptive law is designed so that all the signals of closed-loop systems are bounded, and the tracking errors in position, velocity and rotor fluxes converge to a residual set.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the majority of contemporary robots are still controlled by the decentralized (independent joint) proportional-integral-derivative (PID) law in favor of its simple computation and low-cost setup [3], [4]. Due to strong nonlinearities in dynamics, advanced decentralized control techniques are still attracting much attention to achieve a satisfactory trajectory performance of robot manipulators [5]- [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the majority of contemporary robots are still controlled by the decentralized (independent joint) proportional-integral-derivative (PID) law in favor of its simple computation and low-cost setup [3], [4]. Due to strong nonlinearities in dynamics, advanced decentralized control techniques are still attracting much attention to achieve a satisfactory trajectory performance of robot manipulators [5]- [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been however, found that in the manipulators the strength of the interconnections is bounded by second-order polynomials in states [5]- [10]. Inspired by this, with a third-order feedback control term, adaptive sliding mode controller [6], and adaptive controller [10] with local model estimation have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is difficult to obtain an accurate mathematical model so that model-based decentralized robust controllers can be accurately applied [12,13]. Although decentralized adaptive controllers can achieve fine control and compensate for partially unknown manipulator dynamics, they often suffer from incapacity to deal with unstructured uncertainties [14][15][16]. Hence, there is a need for model-free adaptive control strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, induction motor control constitutes a rather difficult problem due to the highly nonlinear and multivariable nature of its model and to the non-measurability of all state variables: while rotor position and speed along with stator currents can be easily measured, flux sensors are not available in standard induction motors. Solutions to the problem of controlling robot manipulators actuated by induction motors are presented in [1][2][3][4][5]. A local partial state feedback link position tracking controller is proposed in [1], while global output feedback position tracking is obtained in [2]: exact model knowledge is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assuming linear parameterization of manipulator inertia matrix determinant, global asymptotic link position tracking is guaranteed in [3] despite parametric uncertainties in the mechanical subsystem. Robust control algorithms for uncertain robot manipulators driven by current-fed induction motors are proposed in [4,5]: an arbitrarily small link position tracking error can be obtained by properly setting the design parameters. In the case of periodic reference trajectories, system parameter uncertainties may cause periodic disturbances in motor servo drives so that learning control techniques may be successfully applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%