IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006. 2006
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2006.1683631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive delay threshold-based priority queueing scheme for packet scheduling in mobile broadband wireless access system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme is based on the tradeoff of the packet loss rate performance of rtPS with average data throughput of nrtPS with a fixed data rate. Rather than fixing the delay, the author also introduced an adaptive delay threshold-based priority queuing scheme which takes both the urgency and channel state condition for real-time users adaptively into consideration [48].…”
Section: A Channel-unaware Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme is based on the tradeoff of the packet loss rate performance of rtPS with average data throughput of nrtPS with a fixed data rate. Rather than fixing the delay, the author also introduced an adaptive delay threshold-based priority queuing scheme which takes both the urgency and channel state condition for real-time users adaptively into consideration [48].…”
Section: A Channel-unaware Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Kim & Kang, 2005) and (Ku et al, 2006), the authors proposed a packet scheduling scheme called DTPQ (Delay Threshold-based priority Queuing) where both real time (RT) and non-real time (NRT) services are supported. The purpose of the proposed DTPQ scheduling scheme aims to maximize the number of users in the system and increasing the total service revenue.…”
Section: Downlink Homogeneous Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main important parameters taken into account in this scheduling policy is the weight of both RT and NRT services denoted by  RT and  NRT respectively. The downlink packet-scheduling scheme proposed in (Kim & Kang, 2005) does not address how the delay threshold can be set while an adaptive version of DTPQ scheme is implemented in (Ku et al, 2006). In fact, the delay threshold is updated based on the variation of the weighted sum of the delay for the most urgent RT users and average data rate for RT users.…”
Section: Downlink Homogeneous Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation, a hexagonal cell layout with a wraparound structure is considered over 2 tiers, i.e., 19 cells [9]. Each cell is sectorized by a directional antenna.…”
Section: A Simulation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is often found in the 3GPP standardization context. The log-normal shadowing model is specified with a standard deviation of 8 dB and a correlation distance of 50 m. Furthermore, the ITU-R M. 1390 recommendation is implemented for the multi-path fading channel under a terminal mobility of 60 km/h [9]. It is assumed in an ideal situation, that the channel quality indication is fed back without any error and delay, i.e., the downlink channel conditions are always perfectly known.…”
Section: A Simulation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%