2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive distributed finite-time formation control for multi-UAVs under input saturation without collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is able to handle external disturbances and system failures simultaneously, making it more robust than current methods that only consider one constraint at a time (Ullah et al , 2022; Yu et al , 2022). The use of event triggering allows for a reduction in the number of control updates, increasing the efficiency of the system and reducing the communication and computational requirements. The finite-time adaptive control component of the proposed method allowed the system to adapt to changing conditions and disturbances, improving its ability to maintain formation under varying environment as compared to current methods (Liu et al , 2022). The proposed method can be applied to a variety of formation control scenarios and does not rely on a specific type of UAV or communication network, making it more flexible than current methods that are specific to certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is able to handle external disturbances and system failures simultaneously, making it more robust than current methods that only consider one constraint at a time (Ullah et al , 2022; Yu et al , 2022). The use of event triggering allows for a reduction in the number of control updates, increasing the efficiency of the system and reducing the communication and computational requirements. The finite-time adaptive control component of the proposed method allowed the system to adapt to changing conditions and disturbances, improving its ability to maintain formation under varying environment as compared to current methods (Liu et al , 2022). The proposed method can be applied to a variety of formation control scenarios and does not rely on a specific type of UAV or communication network, making it more flexible than current methods that are specific to certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting non‐smooth input nonlinearities may lead to deterioration of system performance, even disastrous consequences, which brings challenges to control design 25 . Up to now, there have been many constructive results devoted to these issues 26‐29 . In Reference 26, adaptive distributed finite‐time formation control has been proposed for multi‐UAVs system with input saturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Up to now, there have been many constructive results devoted to these issues. [26][27][28][29] In Reference 26, adaptive distributed finite-time formation control has been proposed for multi-UAVs system with input saturation. Under the assumption that the dead-zone slopes are constants, the adaptive tracking controllers have been developed for a class of nonlinear systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 24 ], anti-windup compensators are employed against input saturations of a linear MAS. In [ 25 ], an auxiliary dynamic system is introduced to address the saturation problem for multiple UAVs. On the other hand, due to safe operation or system-specific requirements, certain UAV system states must be constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%