2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2020.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive distributed SDN controllers: Application to Content-Centric Delivery Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows the key parameters that were studied, such as RSSI (highest −80 dBm, lowest −100 dBm), transmission power (−20 dBm), modulation level in bits 256QAM, transmission rate (6 Mbps), deviation in RSSI (7 dB), Channel Bandwidth (10 MHz), maximum transmission power (25 mW), total time (1560 s), average distance between CPS nodes (2 m), and reliability (95%). Finally, we provide simulation and experimental results [ 28 , 31 , 32 ] to validate the effectiveness of proposed FISRA with possible future recommendations. To validate the packet loss probability (around 10 −5 –10 −7 in 6G) of an IoT device, the system needs to send 100–109 packets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 2 shows the key parameters that were studied, such as RSSI (highest −80 dBm, lowest −100 dBm), transmission power (−20 dBm), modulation level in bits 256QAM, transmission rate (6 Mbps), deviation in RSSI (7 dB), Channel Bandwidth (10 MHz), maximum transmission power (25 mW), total time (1560 s), average distance between CPS nodes (2 m), and reliability (95%). Finally, we provide simulation and experimental results [ 28 , 31 , 32 ] to validate the effectiveness of proposed FISRA with possible future recommendations. To validate the packet loss probability (around 10 −5 –10 −7 in 6G) of an IoT device, the system needs to send 100–109 packets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] examined and optimized the impact of the energy of TPC and the lifetime of WSNs and WPT systems, respectively, while they do not concentrate on the power management schemes in BSNs. The authors of [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] developed the resource allocation, TPC-based techniques for the cognitive radio, and wireless power transfer networks, but their work does not focus on the power management for smart healthcare. Authors in [ 33 , 34 , 35 ] developed the MAC layer based QoS aware energy efficient technique but do not consider the fair power allocation and management methods.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication networks weave the fabric of the current connected world. SDN is a novel paradigm of network management aiming at separating data and control planes to manage network components flexibly [28]. The controller in SDN acts as the brain of the whole network performing most of the computations.…”
Section: Software-defined Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, Internet architecture faces challenges to scale due to the content-centric requirements of the underlying applications [28]. A vital aspect of the future Internet is that it supports a content-driven paradigm rather than a connection-driven.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the existence of many solutions for energy-efficiency on SDN, only a few of those consider the control-plane consumption. The justification for this is that, in the early days of SDN, it was common to have one controller tied to many switches so the data-plane energy consumption was much higher than the control-plane, thus deserving more attention; however, now, as many works have demonstrated [17][18][19], the recommendation is to have many controllers load-balancing the control of switches. Furthermore, many solutions add tasks to the controller without accounting for the impact on energy consumption of the now much more busy components.…”
Section: Sdn On Data Center Network (Dcn)mentioning
confidence: 99%