2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2015.2488597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive EKF-Based Vehicle State Estimation With Online Assessment of Local Observability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the KF observers are still relatively simple to implement. In summary, the most used observer for VSA estimation is the KF, due to its ability to use input and measurement noise information directly, and because it is robust, stable, and relatively simple to implement [15,18,19].…”
Section: Observer-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the KF observers are still relatively simple to implement. In summary, the most used observer for VSA estimation is the KF, due to its ability to use input and measurement noise information directly, and because it is robust, stable, and relatively simple to implement [15,18,19].…”
Section: Observer-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the kinematic model is concerned with the vehicle motion with no reference to forces; thus, it does not need complex parameters such as those regarding tyres. Figure 1 depicts a vehicle model showing: the vehicle velocity at the centre of gravity (G) V G , the longitudinal and lateral components of V G , respectively u and v, the vehicle yaw rate r, the VSA β, the vehicle track t (here assumed to be the same for the front and the rear), the front and rear semi-wheelbases, respectively a 1 and a 2 , and the vehicle wheelbase l. In summary, the most used observer for VSA estimation is the KF, due to its ability to use input and measurement noise information directly, and because it is robust, stable, and relatively simple to implement [15,18,19].…”
Section: Vehicle Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C s and C a are the longitudinal and lateral stiffnesses of the tire, respectively; S x and S y are the longitudinal slip ratio and lateral slip ratio, respectively; m is the coefficient of road adhesion; and F zw is the vertical load of the tire. The longitudinal slip ratio of tire S x can be calculated according to equation (10)…”
Section: Tire Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the decision-making mechanism requires reliable information about surrounding environment and vehicle dynamic states. 3 Active safety systems can benefit significantly from a prior knowledge of the road conditions. In the vehicle dynamics control, the tyre–road friction coefficient and body’s sideslip angle are two important parameters reflecting the adhesion limit and stability of vehicles, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%