2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2008.4542113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive equalization for filter bank based multicarrier systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach leads to significantly improved results, while keeping the complexity of the algorithm still low [24] (applying it amounts to 4 eq multiplications and 2 eq additions and updating the equalizer coefficients amounts also to 4 eq multiplications and 2 eq additions): …”
Section: Complexity Of Fbmc-qammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach leads to significantly improved results, while keeping the complexity of the algorithm still low [24] (applying it amounts to 4 eq multiplications and 2 eq additions and updating the equalizer coefficients amounts also to 4 eq multiplications and 2 eq additions): …”
Section: Complexity Of Fbmc-qammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From now on, overlap factors of = 2 and also the typical = 4 are considered, assuming eq = 3 equalizer coefficients [25], a number within the typical range of values of 2 to 20 (more than 20 taps do not provide noticeable enhancement [24,26]). Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the cost for the standalone transmitters implementing each waveform for = 2 and = 4, respectively.…”
Section: Complexity Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is recently shown that it only holds when the channel delay spread is small in narrow-band systems [16]. In broadband systems with relatively large channel delay spread, multi-tap equalizers have to be employed in OQAM-OFDM systems for channel equalization [17], which has a high computational complexity and may not apply well in wireless communications. To enable the simple single-tap equalizer to work well, the single-carrier frequency domain equalization (SC-FDE) with the insertion of CP was employed in OQAM-OFDM systems in [18], which requires a redundant interval with the length of both CP and the pulse shaping filter.…”
Section: Ulticarrier Modulation (Mcm) Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the conventional OQAM-OFDM systems do not include a insertion of CP, most of the channel estimation methods are based on the assumption, i.e., the channel delay spread is very short, to be able to employ the simple single-tap equalizer. Otherwise, complex multi-tap equalizers have to be employed for channel equalization [17], [31]. So far, no related literatures focus on the channel estimation in CP-OQAM-OFDM systems.…”
Section: Ulticarrier Modulation (Mcm) Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement stems from the fact that FBMC uses lower transmission power for the same bandwidth compared to OFDM [16] and therefore causes reduced interference. The proposed algorithm is able to transparently exploit this improvement and translate it in increased utility values.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%