2010
DOI: 10.1126/science.1187200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Evolution of an sRNA That Controls Myxococcus Development

Abstract: Mutation of a small noncoding RNA drives adaptive evolution in a social bacterium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1 in the supplemental material) echo a broader theme of plasticity in the genetic elements that underlie proficient myxobacterial development. This theme emerges from analyses that span in breadth from interspecific comparative genomic analysis (63,65) to fine-scale comparison of laboratory-evolved conspecifics that differ by only a few mutations (66,67). Several other loci important for development in M. xanthus strain DK1622 are also absent from other fruiting myxobacteria, suggesting that there are many genetically viable pathways to proficient fruiting body development (63,65).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1 in the supplemental material) echo a broader theme of plasticity in the genetic elements that underlie proficient myxobacterial development. This theme emerges from analyses that span in breadth from interspecific comparative genomic analysis (63,65) to fine-scale comparison of laboratory-evolved conspecifics that differ by only a few mutations (66,67). Several other loci important for development in M. xanthus strain DK1622 are also absent from other fruiting myxobacteria, suggesting that there are many genetically viable pathways to proficient fruiting body development (63,65).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our understanding of the developmental programme is far from complete, it is clear that building a multicellular fruiting body with a defined size and shape requires a regulatory network that is highly responsive to environmental, intercellular and intracellular signals (Kaiser et al, 2010). Through extensive genetic and biochemical studies, a number of factors thought to be involved in cellular aggregation and sporulation have been identified, including sigma factors, two-component proteins, s 54 -dependent enhancer-binding proteins, serine/threonine kinases, proteases, and even non-coding RNA and secondary metabolites (Kaiser et al, 2010;Meiser et al, 2006;Yu et al, 2010). In this work, we initially intended to search for regulatory genes potentially involved in controlling mcu expression; however, using transposon mutagenesis we identified MXAN3487 (MXAN_RS16905), a gene encoding a putative adenosine 59-phosphosulphate (APS) kinase (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, instead, an sRNA is involved, it may be as long as the rcbA coding region (210 bp). Because point mutations in antisense RNAs have been shown to disrupt base pairing and antisense RNA functions (8,27,35,97) and may also inhibit the activity of an sRNA that interacts with a protein, we have not attempted to introduce nonsense or missense mutations into the rcbA gene. Had we introduced mutations that were inactivating, the results would not exclude the involvement of an sRNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%