2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00200-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive finite element computational fluid dynamics using an anisotropic error estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, whereG K denotes the matrix G K (e) with the error ∇e approximated by the Zienkiewicz-Zhu error estimator as in (5). Note that [44, Theorem 4.1] requires some more regularity on the solution, i.e.…”
Section: Asymptotic Analysis and Minimal Mesh Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, whereG K denotes the matrix G K (e) with the error ∇e approximated by the Zienkiewicz-Zhu error estimator as in (5). Note that [44, Theorem 4.1] requires some more regularity on the solution, i.e.…”
Section: Asymptotic Analysis and Minimal Mesh Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisotropic mesh adaptation has proved to be a powerful strategy to improve the quality and efficiency of compressible flow simulations, at first mostly for 2D flows [5,12,21,28]. These anisotropic mesh adaptation techniques were initially based on a metric derived from a numerical approximation of the Hessian of the solutions with, in the background, the use of an a priori error estimator [25,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious concern is the ability to calculate values to the second derivatives of a discontinuous field. One approach used with ¼ finite element basis is the construction of a "recovered" Hessian [3] using patchwise projection procedures in a manner similar to that used to define the popular Zienkiewicz-Zhu error estimators [48]. Although it may be possible to use a similar approach here, the discontinuous nature of the DG basis makes it questionable.…”
Section: Approach Takenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os vários métodos para computar o indicador 2 ߟ são basicamente divididos em duas classes [ALMEIDA et al, 2000]:…”
Section: Classificação Dos Estimadores De Errounclassified