2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive firefly algorithm with chaos for mechanical design optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore makes sense to compare to other results previously published. The results compared to are (1) Coello Coello (2000); (2) Mezura- (2007); (5) Kim et al (2010); (6) Akay and Karaboga (2012); (7) Brajevic and Tuba (2013); (8) Sadollah et al (2013); (9) Gandomi (2014); (10) Baykasoglu and Ozsoydan (2015); (11) Salimi (2015). These represent a spread in the most competitive results obtained for these benchmarks using both historically successful algorithms and more recent state-of-the-art algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison To Previously Published Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It therefore makes sense to compare to other results previously published. The results compared to are (1) Coello Coello (2000); (2) Mezura- (2007); (5) Kim et al (2010); (6) Akay and Karaboga (2012); (7) Brajevic and Tuba (2013); (8) Sadollah et al (2013); (9) Gandomi (2014); (10) Baykasoglu and Ozsoydan (2015); (11) Salimi (2015). These represent a spread in the most competitive results obtained for these benchmarks using both historically successful algorithms and more recent state-of-the-art algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison To Previously Published Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by several works in the literature, integrating chaotic behaviors into population-based optimization approaches allows to substantially improve the exploration and exploitation properties of search agents [21][22][23][24]. With that being said, many recently proposed chaos-based optimization approaches have been successfully applied to solve a wide variety of complex and challenging engineering problems [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During last few years, many scientists and researchers have used several types of nature-inspired metaheuristics to locate the best optimal results of the Welded Beam Design (WBD) problem in the literature, such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) [50][51][52], Unified Particle Swarm Optimization (UPSO) [53], Artificial Bee Colony algorithm (ABC) [54], Co-evolutionary Differential Evolution (CDE) [55], Co-evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization (CPSO) [56], Harmony Search algorithm (IHS) [57], Moth-Flame Optimization algorithm (MFO) [33], Adaptive Firefly Algorithm (AFA) [58], Charged System Search (CSS) [59] and Lightning Search Algorithm-Simplex Method (LSA-SM) [49].…”
Section: Welded Beam Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective is to minimize the total cost. The pressure vessel design problem can be mathematically formulated as below [49]: During the last few decades, several researchers have used different types of metaheuristics to find the best possible optimal solutions of the Pressure Vessel Design Problem in the literature such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) [50][51][52], Artificial Bee Colony algorithm (ABC) [54], Co-evolutionary Differential Evolution (CDE) [55], Co-evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization (CPSO) [56], Improved Harmony Search algorithm (IHS) [57], Moth-Flame Optimization algorithm (MFO) [33], Adaptive Firefly Algorithm (AFA) [58], Bat Algorithm (BA) [60], Cuckoo Search algorithm (CS) [61], Evolution Strategies (ES) [62], Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [63], Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) [64] and Lightning Search Algorithm-Simplex Method (LSA-SM) [49].…”
Section: Pressure Vessel Designmentioning
confidence: 99%