2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive flexibility of the within-hand attentional gradient in touch: An MEG study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2017 ). Researching the interaction between attention and somatotopic processing of digits is important to understand the neural basis of S1 ( Kida et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017 ). Researching the interaction between attention and somatotopic processing of digits is important to understand the neural basis of S1 ( Kida et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we adopted well-defined tasks that properly attempted to control for and standardize top-down effects related to task/attentional set across participants. We considered this important because the activity of the primary somatosensory cortex can be modulated by the relevance of stimuli to behavior, but also fingertip representations can be shaped by task/attentional set (Braun et al, 2002;Lipton et al, 2010;Kida et al, 2018). A dramatic impact of task requirements on the BOLD-activity in the contralateral S1 was evident in this study when comparing activity evoked during the visual thresholdtracking task and the tactile tasks.…”
Section: Strengths Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The minimum sample size for the present study was determined using G*power software (version 3.1) from partial η-squared as was determined in a previous study [31]. The effect size was fixed at 0.35.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the participants may have increased attentional allocation to the movement site and reduced attentional allocation to the stimulation site to achieve high motor performance. Indeed, it has been shown that attentional modulation is affected by the distance between the stimulation site and site of attention [30] and that cortical responses are greater when stimuli are presented to the attentive finger compared to the non-attentive finger [31]. Alternatively, waveforms may be altered by simple summation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%