Applications of Adaptive Control 1980
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-514060-7.50014-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Flight Control: A Pragmatic View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, all available algorithms can exhibit transient undesirable behavior which makes them dangerous to use in practical applications, e.g. control of aircraft [15]. For the most part, the difficulty in applying theoretical results to real problems, with reasonable margins of confidence, can be attributed to the fact that the hypotheses needed to rigorously prove the theory are too restrictive from a practical point of view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, all available algorithms can exhibit transient undesirable behavior which makes them dangerous to use in practical applications, e.g. control of aircraft [15]. For the most part, the difficulty in applying theoretical results to real problems, with reasonable margins of confidence, can be attributed to the fact that the hypotheses needed to rigorously prove the theory are too restrictive from a practical point of view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Structure of Parameterized Closed-Loop Systems: The central controller for the controller parameterization (with Q = 0) is an observer-based controller, and the observer 0 is given by (42) where 2 is the estimate of the state z of the original system. Therefore, a parameterized controller has some separation structure, and the closed-loop system is structured by the diagram, found in Fig.…”
Section: A Separation Principle For Lft Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multidimensional system case, the block structure represents transform variables, and the resulting controller then provides dynamic feedback [16], [ZO]; for an uncertain linear system with structured parameteric or dynamical perturbations, which can be viewed as a linear parameter varying or linear dynamic varying system [39], [41], [37], [SI, [2], the resulting controllers, which are dynamical and depend on the perturbations, therefore may be thought of as gain scheduled or dynamically scheduled 1421, [3 11; the application implications of such control schemes are obvious when the uncertainties can be measured or identified on-line [42], [37].…”
Section: Introduction Inear Fractional Transformations (Lft's) Havmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also had primarily focused on disturbance attenuation and eliminating the need for gain scheduling over the flight envelope as opposed to dealing with damage or failure cases. More complex digital adaptive flight control laws were flight tested in the 1970s [3], but the results were mixed and there was still a great deal of scepticism about adaptive control's suitability and value for aircraft [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%