Adaptive Heuristics That (Could) Fit: Information Search and Communication Patterns in an Online Forum of Investors Under Market Uncertainty

Abstract

This article examines information-search heuristics and communication patterns in an online forum of investors during a period of market uncertainty. Global connections, real-time communication, and technological sophistication have created an unpredictable market environment. As such, investors try to deal with semantic, strategic, and operational uncertainty by following heuristics that reduce information redundancy. In this study, we have tried to find traces of cognitive communication heuristics in a large-scale data set including 8 years of online posts (2004–2012) for a forum of Italian investors. We identified various market volatility conditions on a daily basis to understand the influence of market uncertainty on cognitive and communication processes. We found that investors communicated more dynamically when the market was unstable, while they were more prone to anchor heuristic when market uncertainty was invariant. Furthermore, abnormal market trends triggered more availability-based communication patterns. We also found that expertise matters. This would suggest that online communities need intelligent, context-specific tools to support partner selection and stimulate nonredundant communication.

Confirmation Bias in Seeking Climate Information: Employing Relative Search Volume to Predict Partisan Climate Opinions

“…The first is intuitive and heuristic, and the second is deliberative and analytic (Evans, 1984; Wason & Evans, 1974). Heuristic processing requires less cognitive effort and resources, whereas systematic processing requires comprehensive judgment (Casnici et al, 2019; Chaiken, 1980). Scholarship has revealed that although systematic processing produces enduring attitudes and a better understanding of complicated problems, people often prefer heuristic processing and strategies to conserve cognitive effort unless motivated by powerless status or increased emotion (Ebenbach & Keltner, 1998).…”

A role-game laboratory experiment on the influence of country prospects reports on investment decisions in two artificial organizational settings

“…Previous research has shown that when facing relatively well-structured problems, decision makers tend to economize on cognitive resources by relying, even unintentionally, on framing effects, such as opinions of relevant others or defensive routines (Simon 1973;Levinthal and Rerup 2006;Kheirandish and Mousavi 2018). When problems are ill-structured, decision makers tend to follow adaptive heuristics by exploiting experience and analogies that reduce strategic and operational uncertainty into a coherent 'problem-space' -to paraphrase Nevel and Simon (1972; see also Goel 1992;Casnici et al 2019).…”