Proceedings of VIZ '97: Visualization Conference, Information Visualization Symposium and Parallel Rendering Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/infvis.1997.636778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive information visualization based on the user's multiple viewpoints-interactive 3D visualization of the WWW

Abstract: This paper introduces the adaptive information visualization method for the hypermedia and the WWW based on the user's multiple viewpoints. We propose two graphical interfaces, the CVI and the RF-Cone. The CVI is the interface for interactive viewpoint selection. We can select viewpoint reflecting our interests by using the CVI. According to the given viewpoint, the RF-Cone adaptively organizes the 3D representation of the hypermedia so that we can understand the semantic and structural relationship among the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The information visualizer (1991) was a 3D version of the Rooms virtual desktop (Henderson and Card, 1986) that also (besides the Perspective wall presented in 4.4) allowed users to visualise their information in a 3D hierarchical visualisation Cone Tree with a zooming interface . Several other tree based visualisation techniques (whether used for PIM or not) to visualise large hierarchies are available such as a classic radial tree, Fractal trees (1993) (Koike and Yoshihara, 1993), Fviz (1995) -an improved cone tree or a balloon view of a radial tree (Carriere and Kazman, 1995), Hyperbolic browser (1995) (later Star Tree Studio) -a hyperbolic tree with a fisheye zooming capability (Lamping et al, 1995), RF-Cone tree (1997) -a 3D version of a tree similar to Fviz (Teraoka and Maruyama, 1997), Cata-Cone tree (1997) -a cone tree with additional tree information (Hearst and Karadi, 1997), Disc Trees (1998) -another 3D variant of a cone like tree (Jeong and Pang, 1998), Circular trees (2006) -similar to radial or hyperbolic tree (Ciccarelli et al, 2006), Hierarchical Edge Bundles (2006) (Holten, 2006), and Bubble tree (2006) (Grivet et al, 2006). There are also more abstract hierarchy visualisations such as Botanical Trees Tree Viewer (2001) (Kleiberg et al, 2001; and PhylloTrees (2006) (Neumann et al, 2006).…”
Section: Different Visualisations Of the File Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information visualizer (1991) was a 3D version of the Rooms virtual desktop (Henderson and Card, 1986) that also (besides the Perspective wall presented in 4.4) allowed users to visualise their information in a 3D hierarchical visualisation Cone Tree with a zooming interface . Several other tree based visualisation techniques (whether used for PIM or not) to visualise large hierarchies are available such as a classic radial tree, Fractal trees (1993) (Koike and Yoshihara, 1993), Fviz (1995) -an improved cone tree or a balloon view of a radial tree (Carriere and Kazman, 1995), Hyperbolic browser (1995) (later Star Tree Studio) -a hyperbolic tree with a fisheye zooming capability (Lamping et al, 1995), RF-Cone tree (1997) -a 3D version of a tree similar to Fviz (Teraoka and Maruyama, 1997), Cata-Cone tree (1997) -a cone tree with additional tree information (Hearst and Karadi, 1997), Disc Trees (1998) -another 3D variant of a cone like tree (Jeong and Pang, 1998), Circular trees (2006) -similar to radial or hyperbolic tree (Ciccarelli et al, 2006), Hierarchical Edge Bundles (2006) (Holten, 2006), and Bubble tree (2006) (Grivet et al, 2006). There are also more abstract hierarchy visualisations such as Botanical Trees Tree Viewer (2001) (Kleiberg et al, 2001; and PhylloTrees (2006) (Neumann et al, 2006).…”
Section: Different Visualisations Of the File Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term has also been used, with some frequency and great inconsistency, in the areas of information visualization and Human Computer Interfaces (HCI). Researchers such as Teraoka and Maruyama (1997) are generally interested in representing a searcher's interests and purpose. They use “multiple viewpoints” to mean parameters to an information visualization system that indicate how to present information based on a particular interest profile.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%