2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12038-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Integration of Distributed Semantic Web Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the details are not given in their publication so it is not clear how ANAPSID estimates the triple patterns' execution times. ADERIS (Lynden et al, 2010(Lynden et al, , 2011) also uses list of predicates as metadata catalog and predicate-based selection for data source selection. It sends SPARQL SELECT queries with DISTINCT keyword to each endpoint to find out the unique predicates.…”
Section: Data Source Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the details are not given in their publication so it is not clear how ANAPSID estimates the triple patterns' execution times. ADERIS (Lynden et al, 2010(Lynden et al, , 2011) also uses list of predicates as metadata catalog and predicate-based selection for data source selection. It sends SPARQL SELECT queries with DISTINCT keyword to each endpoint to find out the unique predicates.…”
Section: Data Source Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADERIS generates predicate tables for each predicate which cover the related subjects and objects of that predicate. The first version of ADERIS [9] joins two predicate tables as they become complete while the other predicate tables are being generated. In the second version, Lynden et al [10] propose an adaptive cost model to determine the join order.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, we think that adaptive query optimization [7] is a need in this unpredictable environment. There are only two engines ANAPSID [8] and ADERIS [9,10] which consider adaptive query optimization for query federation. Acosta et al [8] propose a non-blocking join method based on symmetric hash join [11] and Xjoin [12] whereas Lynden et al [10] propose a cost model for dynamically changing the join order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, indices are kept describing the contents and capabilities of the different query endpoints. For instance, in [9], properties found in a dataset are extracted and stored, which is equivalent to SIM1. In semwiq [10], lists of classes and properties are kept; this leads to information loss compared to SIM2 and SIM3, as it is no longer known which classes occur in the domain or range of the found properties.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%