2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-022-01868-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Integration of Nonlinear Evolution Equations on Tensor Manifolds

Abstract: We develop new adaptive algorithms for temporal integration of nonlinear evolution equations on tensor manifolds. These algorithms, which we call step-truncation methods, are based on performing one time step with a conventional time-stepping scheme, followed by a truncation operation onto a tensor manifold. By selecting the rank of the tensor manifold adaptively to satisfy stability and accuracy requirements, we prove convergence of a wide range of step-truncation methods, including explicit one-step and mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrating the PDE (20) forward in on a FTT tensor manifold, e.g. using rank-adaptive step-truncation methods [32,31,20] or dynamic tensor approximation methods [11,10,9,24,21], results in a FTT approximation v TT (x; ) of the function v(x; ) for all ≥ 0. The computational cost of this approach for computing the FTT expansion of a FTT ridge function is precisely the same cost as solving the hyperbolic PDE (20) in the FTT format, which in the case of step-truncation or dynamic approximation has computational complexity that scales linearly with d. Note that the accuracy of v TT (x; ) as an approximation of v(x; ) depends on the step-size and order of integration scheme used to solve the PDE (20).…”
Section: Computing Tensor Ridge Functions Via Coordinate Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Integrating the PDE (20) forward in on a FTT tensor manifold, e.g. using rank-adaptive step-truncation methods [32,31,20] or dynamic tensor approximation methods [11,10,9,24,21], results in a FTT approximation v TT (x; ) of the function v(x; ) for all ≥ 0. The computational cost of this approach for computing the FTT expansion of a FTT ridge function is precisely the same cost as solving the hyperbolic PDE (20) in the FTT format, which in the case of step-truncation or dynamic approximation has computational complexity that scales linearly with d. Note that the accuracy of v TT (x; ) as an approximation of v(x; ) depends on the step-size and order of integration scheme used to solve the PDE (20).…”
Section: Computing Tensor Ridge Functions Via Coordinate Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is straightforward to verify that ( 25) satisfies (26). Note that v(x; ) in ( 25) is not an FTT tensor if = πk/2 and k ∈ N. To compute the FTT representation of v TT (x; ) we can solve the PDE (26) on a tensor manifold using step-truncation or dynamic tensor approximation methods [9,11,31,33]. Given the low dimensionality of the spatial domain in this example (d = 2), we can also evaluate (25) directly, and compute its FTT decomposition by solving an eigenvalue problem.…”
Section: Computing Tensor Ridge Functions Via Coordinate Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations